Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2022 Aug 3;11(8):1055.
doi: 10.3390/antibiotics11081055.

Antibiotic Allergy De-Labeling: A Pathway against Antibiotic Resistance

Affiliations
Review

Antibiotic Allergy De-Labeling: A Pathway against Antibiotic Resistance

Inmaculada Doña et al. Antibiotics (Basel). .

Abstract

Antibiotics are one of the most frequently prescribed drugs. Unfortunately, they also are the most common cause for self-reported drug allergy, limiting the use of effective therapies. However, evidence shows that more than 90% of patients labeled as allergic to antibiotics are not allergic. Importantly, the label of antibiotic allergy, whether real or not, constitutes a major public health problem as it directly impacts antimicrobial stewardship: it has been associated with broad-spectrum antibiotic use, often resulting in the emergence of bacterial resistance. Therefore, an accurate diagnosis is crucial for de-labeling patients who claim to be allergic but are not really allergic. This review presents allergy methods for achieving successful antibiotic allergy de-labeling. Patient clinical history is often inaccurately reported, thus not being able to de-label most patients. In vitro testing offers a complementary approach but it shows limitations. Immunoassay for quantifying specific IgE is the most used one, although it gives low sensitivity and is limited to few betalactams. Basophil activation test is not validated and not available in all centers. Therefore, true de-labeling still relies on in vivo tests including drug provocation and/or skin tests, which are not risk-exempt and require specialized healthcare professionals for results interpretation and patient management. Moreover, differences on the pattern of antibiotic consumption cause differences in the diagnostic approach among different countries. A multidisciplinary approach is recommended to reduce the risks associated with the reported penicillin allergy label.

Keywords: IgE; T-cell; allergy; drug provocation test; in vitro test; skin test.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

None of the authors have any conflict of interest. All authors have given final approval to the version to be published.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Classification of hypersensitivity reactions to antibiotics.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Algorithm for evaluating suspicion of allergic reactions to antibiotics.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Torres M.J., Blanca M. The complex clinical picture of beta-lactam hypersensitivity: Penicillins, cephalosporins, monobactams, carbapenems, and clavams. Med. Clin. N. Am. 2010;94:805–820. doi: 10.1016/j.mcna.2010.04.006. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Doña I., Blanca-López N., Torres M.J., García-Campos J., García-Núñez I., Gómez F., Salas M., Rondón C., Canto M.G., Blanca M. Drug hypersensitivity reactions: Response patterns, drug involved, and temporal variations in a large series of patients. J. Investig. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2012;22:363. - PubMed
    1. Zambonino M.A., Corzo J.L., Muñoz C., Requena G., Ariza A., Mayorga C., Urda A., Blanca M., Torres M.J. Diagnostic evaluation of hypersensitivity reactions to beta-lactam antibiotics in a large population of children. Pediatr. Allergy Immunol. 2013;25:80–87. doi: 10.1111/pai.12155. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Shenoy E.S., Macy E., Rowe T., Blumenthal K.G. Evaluation and Management of Penicillin Allergy: A Review. JAMA. 2019;321:188–199. doi: 10.1001/jama.2018.19283. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ibia E.O., Schwartz R.H., Wiedermann B.L. Antibiotic rashes in children: A survey in a private practice setting. Arch. Dermatol. 2000;136:849–854. doi: 10.1001/archderm.136.7.849. - DOI - PubMed