Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Aug 12;11(8):1098.
doi: 10.3390/antibiotics11081098.

Diagnostic Value of CRP and Serum WBC Count during Septic Two-Stage Revision of Total Hip Arthroplasties

Affiliations

Diagnostic Value of CRP and Serum WBC Count during Septic Two-Stage Revision of Total Hip Arthroplasties

Moritz Mederake et al. Antibiotics (Basel). .

Abstract

The diagnostic value of C-reactive protein (CRP) and the serum white blood cell (WBC) count is still barely defined for decision making during septic two-stage revision surgery of hip arthroplasty. We, therefore, compared these values between stages as well as between the groups without and with reinfection in 117 patients. A total of 106 patients were reinfection-free (91%). The median follow-up was 51 months. With a ΔCRP of -10 mg/L and a ΔWBC count of -1000/µL, a significant decrease between stages (p = 0.001) could be observed. When comparing the CRP and WBC count values between groups, however, no significant difference was found at stage one, stage two and even the difference between these two time points (reinfection-free ΔCRP of -11 mg/L and ΔWBC count of -1000/µL vs. reinfection ΔCRP of -5 mg/L (p = 0.131) and ΔWBC count of -1100/µL) (p = 0.424). The diagnostic value was poor for the calculated parameters (area under the curve (AUC) 0.5-0.6). The courses of the mean CRP values of both groups were similar. We conclude that the CRP and WBC count are not helpful to guide the decision making in individual cases.

Keywords: CRP; bone and joint infections; hip arthroplasty; infection parameters; orthopedic infections; periprosthetic joint infection; two-stage revision; white blood cell count.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Boxplots for C-reactive protein (“CRP“) values prior to stage-one and prior to stage-two surgeries, divided in groups without and with reinfection.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Boxplots for white blood cell count (“WBC count“) values prior to stage-one and prior to stage-two surgeries, divided in groups without and with reinfection.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Receiver operating characteristic curves for C-reactive protein prior to stage two (“CRP stage two“) and for ΔCRP (CRP stage two minus CRP stage one).
Figure 4
Figure 4
Receiver operating characteristic curves for white blood cell count prior to stage two (“WBC count stage two“) and for ΔWBC count (WBC count stage two minus WBC count stage one).
Figure 5
Figure 5
Mean C-reactive protein (CRP) value preoperatively and in the further clinical course of patients without reinfection (blue curve) and with reinfection (green curve).
Figure 6
Figure 6
The area under the curve (AUC) of the mean C-reactive protein (CRP) values preoperatively and in the further clinical course of cases without reinfection ((a) green curve) and with reinfection ((b) orange curve).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Lamagni T. Epidemiology and burden of prosthetic joint infections. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2014;69((Suppl. S1)):i5–i10. doi: 10.1093/jac/dku247. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Jamari J., Ammarullah M.I., Santoso G., Sugiharto S., Supriyono T., Prakoso A.T., Basri H., van der Heide E. Computational Contact Pressure Prediction of CoCrMo, SS 316L and Ti6Al4V Femoral Head against UHMWPE Acetabular Cup under Gait Cycle. J. Funct. Biomater. 2022;13:64. doi: 10.3390/jfb13020064. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Garvin K.L., Hanssen A.D. Infection after total hip arthroplasty. Past, present, and future. J. Bone Joint Surg. Am. 1995;77:1576–1588. doi: 10.2106/00004623-199510000-00015. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Fink B. Revision of late periprosthetic infections of total hip endoprostheses: Pros and cons of different concepts. Int. J. Med. Sci. 2009;6:287–295. doi: 10.7150/ijms.6.287. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Cui Q., Mihalko W.M., Shields J.S., Ries M., Saleh K.J. Antibiotic-impregnated cement spacers for the treatment of infection associated with total hip or knee arthroplasty. J. Bone Joint Surg. Am. 2007;89:871–882. doi: 10.2106/00004623-200704000-00026. - DOI - PubMed