Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2022 Aug 20;9(8):1257.
doi: 10.3390/children9081257.

Diagnostic Tools in the Detection of Physical Child Abuse: A Systematic Review

Affiliations
Review

Diagnostic Tools in the Detection of Physical Child Abuse: A Systematic Review

Vito Pavone et al. Children (Basel). .

Abstract

Child abuse is a critical social issue. The orthopedic surgeon's role is essential in noticing signs and symptoms of physical abuse. For this reason, several authors have proposed scoring systems to identify abuse early on and reduce undiagnosed cases. The aim of this systematic review is to overview the screening tools in the literature. In 2021, three independent authors performed a systematic review of two electronic medical databases using the following inclusion criteria: physical child abuse, questionnaire, survey, score, screening tool and predictive tool. Patients who had experienced sexual abuse or emotional abuse were excluded. The risk of bias evaluation of the articles was performed according to the Newcastle-Ottawa Quality Assessment Scale Cohort Studies. Any evidence-level study reporting clinical data and dealing with a physical child abuse diagnosis tool was considered. A total of 217 articles were found. After reading the full texts and checking the reference lists, n = 12 (71,035 patients) articles were selected. A total of seven screening tools were found. However, only some of the seven diagnostic tools included demonstrated a high rate of sensitivity and specificity. The main limits of the studies were the lack of heterogeneity of evidence and samples and the lack of common assessing tools. Despite the multiplicity of questionnaires aimed at detecting validated child abuse, there was not a single worldwide questionnaire for early diagnosis. A combination of more than one test might increase the validity of the investigation.

Keywords: abuse; child; maltreatment; neglect; orthopedic; physical.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis) flowchart of the systematic literature review.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Marine M.B., Forbes-Amrhein M.M. Fractures of Child Abuse. Pediatr. Radiol. 2021;51:1003–1013. doi: 10.1007/s00247-020-04945-1. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Sethi D., Yon Y., Parekh N., Anderson T., Huber J., Rakovac I., Meinck F. European Status Report on Preventing Child Maltreatment. World Health Organization; Geneva, Switzerland: 2019.
    1. Butchart A., Mikton C., Dahlberg L.L., Krug E.G. Global Status Report on Violence Prevention 2014. Inj Prev. 2015;21:213. doi: 10.1136/injuryprev-2015-041640. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Jayakumar P., Barry M., Ramachandran M. Orthopaedic Aspects of Paediatric Non-Accidental Injury. J. Bone Jt. Surg. 2010;92:189–195. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.92B2.22923. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Gonzalez D., Bethencourt Mirabal A., McCall J.D. StatPearls. StatPearls Publishing; Treasure Island, FL, USA: 2022. Child Abuse and Neglect. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources