Quality of Life and Conformity to Gender Norms in Women Receiving Assisted Reproductive Technologies as a Potential Indicator of Mental Health
- PMID: 36011666
- PMCID: PMC9408235
- DOI: 10.3390/ijerph191610031
Quality of Life and Conformity to Gender Norms in Women Receiving Assisted Reproductive Technologies as a Potential Indicator of Mental Health
Abstract
The prevalence of depression, stress, or anxiety in people receiving assisted reproductive technologies (ART) has been demonstrated. However, knowledge about the influence of gender norms on quality of life (QofL) during infertility treatment is limited. The main objective of this study was to confirm that patients undergoing ART present a vulnerable mental state, which may be an indicator of risk. For this purpose, a quasi-experimental cross-sectional study was carried out in the Assisted Reproduction Unit of the Hospital Politécnico Universitario de la Fe (Spain) in which a total of 438 women participated: 256 in pre-treatment and 182 in treatment. Two questionnaires were administered, FertiQol and CFNI-23, assessing self-perceived QofL and conformity to gender norms, respectively. The results showed significant differences between the pre-treatment and treatment groups on the FertiQol and its subscales. Significant associations were also found between the CFNI-23 factors and the FertiQol subscales. The results suggest that gender norms and ART interfere with women's mental health and QofL and should be considered as possible risk indicators by professionals preventively before the prenatal or perinatal stages. Future research should design prospective studies aimed at estimating the impact of clinical and sociodemographic variables on women and other groups receiving ART.
Keywords: CFNI; FertiQol; assisted reproductive technology; gender norms; infertility; perinatal mental health; quality of life.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript; or in the decision to publish the results.
References
-
- Calhaz-Jorge C., De Geyter C.H., Kupka M.S., Wyns C., Mocanu E., Motrenko T., Scaravelli G., Smeenk J., Vidakovic S., Goossens V. Survey on ART and IUI: Legislation, regulation, funding and registries in European countries: The European IVF-monitoring Consortium (EIM) for the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology (ESHRE) Hum. Reprod. Open. 2020;6:1. doi: 10.1093/hropen/hoz044. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- Salama M., Isachenko V., Isachenko E., Rahimi G., Mallmann P., Westphal L.M., Inhorn M.C., Patrizio P. Cross border reproductive care (CBRC): A growing global phenomenon with multidimensional implications (a systematic and critical review) J. Assist. Reprod. Genet. 2018;35:1277–1288. doi: 10.1007/s10815-018-1181-x. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- Ying L., Wu L.H., Loke A.Y. The effects of psychosocial interventions on the mental health, pregnancy rates, and marital function of infertile couples undergoing in vitro fertilization: A systematic review. J. Assist. Reprod. Gene. 2016;33:689–701. doi: 10.1007/s10815-016-0690-8. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- Ockhuijsen H., Van den Hoogen A., Eijkemans M., Macklon N., Boivin J. The impact of a self-administered coping intervention on emotional well-being in women awaiting the outcome of IVF treatment: A randomized controlled trial. Hum. Reprod. 2014;29:1459–1470. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deu093. - DOI - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
