Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Aug 20;19(16):10372.
doi: 10.3390/ijerph191610372.

Zoonotic Problems Reported by Sheep and Goat Farmers and Factors Potentially Contributing to the Occurrence of Brucellosis among Them

Affiliations

Zoonotic Problems Reported by Sheep and Goat Farmers and Factors Potentially Contributing to the Occurrence of Brucellosis among Them

Daphne T Lianou et al. Int J Environ Res Public Health. .

Abstract

The study aimed to investigate the occurrence of zoonotic problems reported by dairy small ruminant farmers in Greece and to study potential associations with socio-demographic characteristics of the farmers and management practices applied in the farms. A countrywide investigation was performed in 325 sheep and 119 goat farms in the 13 administrative regions of Greece. The selected farms were visited and interviews were conducted with respective farmers. The occurrence of zoonotic problems in the farmers was recorded. A total biosecurity score (0−6) was devised, based on biosecurity practices followed in farms. Sixty-seven farmers (15.10%, 95% confidence intervals (CI): 12.1−18.7%) reported experiencing a zoonotic problem. Most of the farmers (n = 57) (85.1%, 95% CI: 74.76−91.7%, of those with a zoonotic problem) (12.8%, 95% CI: 10.0−16.3%, of all) reported that the zoonotic problem had been brucellosis. Odds ratio for the occurrence of brucellosis in goat farmers was 1.879 (95% CI: 1.051−3.359) compared to the occurrence of the infection in sheep farmers (p = 0.033). For the outcome ‘occurrence of brucellosis’ in sheep farmers, the application of hand-milking, the availability of a separate lambing area and the presence of cats in the farm emerged as significant (p < 0.01); for the same outcome in goat farmers, only the availability of a separate kidding area emerged as significant (p = 0.001). The mean biosecurity score in farms in the continental area of the country was significantly higher than in the islands: 3.45 ± 0.05 versus 2.76 ± 0.28, respectively (p = 0.006), whilst there was also a significantly higher score in farms, where the farmer reported occurrence of brucellosis: 3.68 ± 0.15 versus 3.34 ± 0.06 in farms, where the farmer did not report such an incident (p = 0.042). In farms, where the above predictors prevail, farmers should be warned of an increased potential risk for human infection and biosecurity measures should be implemented and tightened.

Keywords: biosecurity; brucellosis; goat; health management; sheep; zoonosis.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Location of 444 small ruminant farms around Greece, which were visited during a countrywide study for interview of farmers regarding zoonotic problems.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Proportions of sheep and goat farmers who reported occurrence of a zoonotic problem, during a countrywide study in Greece (light brown color: report of occurrence of brucellosis, gray color: report of occurrence of other zoonotic problem).
Figure 3
Figure 3
Proportions of sheep farmers who reported occurrence of brucellosis during a countrywide study in Greece, in association with practices employed in the respective farms (MM: machine-milking, HM: hand-milking, ASA: availability of separate lambing area, LSA, lack of separate lambing area).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Hellenic Agricultural Organisation—Demeter Deliveries of Ovine and Caprine Milk by Region and Regional Authority and Average Milk Price—Calendar Year 2019. Cumulative Data Updated. [(accessed on 12 January 2022)]. Available online: https://www.elgo.gr/images/ELOGAK_files/Statistics/2021/Milk21/6.ΕΛΓO_ST....
    1. Pulina G., Milán M.J., Lavín M.P., Theodoridis A., Morin E., Capote J., Thomas D.L., Francesconi A.H.D., Caja G. Current production trends, farm structures, and economics of the dairy sheep and goat sectors. J. Dairy Sci. 2018;101:6715–6729. doi: 10.3168/jds.2017-14015. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ministry of Agricultural Development & Food . Greek Agriculture—Animal Production. Ministry of Agricultural Development & Food, General Directorate for Animal Production; Athens, Greece: 2018. p. 16.
    1. Hadjigeorgiou I., Vallerand F., Tsimpoukas K., Zervas G. The socio-economics of sheep and goat farming in Greece and the implications for future rural development. Opt. Méditerran. B Etud. Recherch. 2002;39:83–93.
    1. Bauerfeind R., von Graevenitz A., Kimmig P., Schiefer H.G., Schwarz T., Slenczka W., Zahner H. Zoonoses, Infectious Diseases Transmissible from Animals to Humans. 4th ed. ASM Press; Washington, DC, USA: 2016. 532p

LinkOut - more resources