Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Aug 16;11(16):4775.
doi: 10.3390/jcm11164775.

Debating the Future of Sickle Cell Disease Curative Therapy: Haploidentical Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation vs. Gene Therapy

Adetola A Kassim  1 , Alexis Leonard  2   3
Affiliations

Debating the Future of Sickle Cell Disease Curative Therapy: Haploidentical Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation vs. Gene Therapy

Adetola A Kassim et al. J Clin Med. .

Abstract

Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) is a well-established curative therapy for patients with sickle cell disease (SCD) when using a human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-matched sibling donor. Most patients with SCD do not have a matched sibling donor, thereby significantly limiting the accessibility of this curative option to most patients. HLA-haploidentical HSCT with post-transplant cyclophosphamide expands the donor pool, with current approaches now demonstrating high overall survival, reduced toxicity, and an effective reduction in acute and chronic graft-vs.-host disease (GvHD). Alternatively, autologous genetic therapies appear promising and have the potential to overcome significant barriers associated with allogeneic HSCT, such as donor availability and GvHD. Here the authors each take a viewpoint and discuss what will be the future of curative options for patients with SCD outside of a matched sibling transplantation, specifically haploidentical HSCT vs. gene therapy.

Keywords: CRISPR/Cas9; allogeneic transplantation; autologous transplantation; gene therapy; haploidentical; hematopoietic stem cell transplantation; sickle cell disease.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Risk factors for cancer post-transplantation for sickle cell disease.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Lanzkron S., Carroll C.P., Haywood C., Jr. Mortality rates and age at death from sickle cell disease: U.S., 1979–2005. Public Health Rep. 2013;128:110–116. doi: 10.1177/003335491312800206. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Paulukonis S.T., Eckman J.R., Snyder A.B., Hagar W., Feuchtbaum L.B., Zhou M., Grant A.M., Hulihan M.M. Defining Sickle Cell Disease Mortality Using a Population-Based Surveillance System, 2004 through 2008. Public Health Rep. 2016;131:367–375. doi: 10.1177/003335491613100221. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Gluckman E., Cappelli B., Bernaudin F., Labopin M., Volt F., Carreras J., Pinto Simoes B., Ferster A., Dupont S., de la Fuente J., et al. Sickle cell disease: An international survey of results of HLA-identical sibling hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Blood. 2017;129:1548–1556. doi: 10.1182/blood-2016-10-745711. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Gragert L., Eapen M., Williams E., Freeman J., Spellman S., Baitty R., Hartzman R., Rizzo J.D., Horowitz M., Confer D., et al. HLA match likelihoods for hematopoietic stem-cell grafts in the U.S. registry. N. Engl. J. Med. 2014;371:339–348. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsa1311707. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Walters M.C., Patience M., Leisenring W., Eckman J.R., Buchanan G.R., Rogers Z.R., Olivieri N.E., Vichinsky E., Davies S.C., Mentzer W.C., et al. Barriers to bone marrow transplantation for sickle cell anemia. Biol. Blood Marrow Transpl. 1996;2:100–104. - PubMed