Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Aug 18;11(16):4848.
doi: 10.3390/jcm11164848.

Investigating the Prediction Accuracy of Recently Updated Intraocular Lens Power Formulas with Artificial Intelligence for High Myopia

Affiliations

Investigating the Prediction Accuracy of Recently Updated Intraocular Lens Power Formulas with Artificial Intelligence for High Myopia

Miki Omoto et al. J Clin Med. .

Abstract

The aim of this study was to investigate the prediction accuracy of intraocular lens (IOL) power formulas with artificial intelligence (AI) for high myopia. Cases of highly myopic patients (axial length [AL], >26.0 mm) undergoing uncomplicated cataract surgery with at least 1-month follow-up were included. Prediction errors, absolute errors, and percentages of eyes with prediction errors within ±0.25, ±0.50, and ±1.00 diopters (D) were compared using five formulas: Hill-RBF3.0, Kane, Barrett Universal II (BUII), Haigis, and SRK/T. Seventy eyes (mean patient age at surgery, 64.0 ± 9.0 years; mean AL, 27.8 ± 1.3 mm) were included. The prediction errors with the Hill-RBF3.0 and Kane formulas were statistically different from the BUII, Haigis, and SRK/T formulas, whereas there was not a statistically significant difference between those with the Hill-RBF3.0 and Kane. The absolute errors with the Hill-RBF3.0 and Kane formulas were smaller than that with the BUII formula, whereas there was not a statistically significant difference between the other formulas. The percentage within ±0.25 D with the Hill-RBF3.0 formula was larger than that with the BUII formula. The prediction accuracy using AI (Hill-RBF3.0 and Kane) showed excellent prediction accuracy. No significant difference was observed in the prediction accuracy between the Hill-RBF3.0 and Kane formulas.

Keywords: artificial intelligence; cataract; intraocular lens.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Prediction error (A), absolute error (B) and stacked bar chart (C) of prediction accuracy with each formula. BUII = Barrett Universal II; D = diopters. Wang Koch adjustment was applied for the Haigis and SRK/T formulas.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Prediction error (A), absolute error (B) and stacked bar chart (C) of prediction accuracy with each formula in eyes with axial length > 28.0 mm. BUII = Barrett Universal II; D = diopters. Wang Koch adjustment was applied for the Haigis and SRK/T formulas.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Prediction error (A), absolute error (B) and stacked bar chart (C) of prediction accuracy with each formula in eyes with axial length < 28.0 mm. BUII = Barrett Universal II; D = diopters. Wang Koch adjustment was applied for the Haigis and SRK/T formulas.

References

    1. Haigis W. Intraocular lens calculation in extreme myopia. J. Cataract Refract. Surg. 2009;35:906–911. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2008.12.035. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Melles R.B., Holladay J.T., Chang W.J. Accuracy of Intraocular Lens Calculation Formulas. Ophthalmology. 2018;125:169–178. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2017.08.027. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Dolgin E. The myopia boom. Nature. 2015;519:276–278. doi: 10.1038/519276a. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Morgan I.G., French A.N., Ashby R.S., Guo X., Ding X., He M., Rose K.A. The epidemics of myopia: Aetiology and prevention. Prog. Retin. Eye Res. 2018;62:134–149. doi: 10.1016/j.preteyeres.2017.09.004. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Morgan I.G., Ohno-Matsui K., Saw S.-M. Myopia. Lancet. 2012;379:1739–1748. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60272-4. - DOI - PubMed