Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Aug 12;12(8):1310.
doi: 10.3390/jpm12081310.

Outcomes of Importance to Patients in Reproductive Genetic Carrier Screening: A Qualitative Study to Inform a Core Outcome Set

Affiliations

Outcomes of Importance to Patients in Reproductive Genetic Carrier Screening: A Qualitative Study to Inform a Core Outcome Set

Ebony Richardson et al. J Pers Med. .

Abstract

There is significant heterogeneity in the outcomes assessed across studies of reproductive genetic carrier screening (RGCS). Only a small number of studies have measured patient-reported outcomes or included patients in the selection of outcomes that are meaningful to them. This study was a cross-sectional, qualitative study of 15 patient participants conducted to inform a core outcome set. A core outcome set is an approach to facilitate standardisation in outcome reporting, allowing direct comparison of outcomes across studies to enhance understanding of impacts and potential harms. The aim of this study was to incorporate the patient perspective in the development of a core outcome set by eliciting a detailed understanding of outcomes of importance to patients. Data were collected via online, semi-structured interviews using a novel method informed by co-design and the nominal group technique. Data were analysed using reflexive thematic analysis. Outcomes elicited from patient stakeholder interviews highlighted several under-explored areas for future research. This includes the role of grief and loss in increased risk couples, the role of empowerment in conceptualising the utility of RGCS, the impact of societal context and barriers that contribute to negative experiences, and the role of genetic counselling in ensuring that information needs are met and informed choice facilitated as RGCS becomes increasingly routine. Future research should focus on incorporating outcomes that accurately reflect patient needs and experience.

Keywords: core outcome set; patient perspective; reproductive genetic carrier screening.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Interview schedule overview with examples.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Block diagram illustrating the CODECS outcome domains represented across interviews, with higher level COMET taxonomy outcome domains indicated by A–I.

References

    1. Committee on Genetics. Committee Opinion No. 691: Carrier screening for genetic conditions. Obs. Gynecol. 2017;129:e41–e55. - PubMed
    1. The Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (RANZCOG) Genomics Advisory Working Group & Women’s Health Committee Statement. Genetic Carrier Screening. 2019.
    1. Wilson R.D., De Bie I., Armour C.M., Brown R.N., Campagnolo C., Carroll J.C., Okun N., Nelson T., Zwingerman R., Audibert F., et al. Joint SOGC-CCMG Opinion for Reproductive Genetic Carrier Screening: An Update for All Canadian Providers of Maternity and Reproductive Healthcare in the Era of Direct-to-Consumer Testing. J. Obs. Gynaecol. Can. 2016;38:742–762.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.jogc.2016.06.008. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Richardson E., McEwen A., Newton-John T., Crook A., Jacobs C. Systematic review of outcomes in studies of reproductive genetic carrier screening: Towards development of a core outcome set. Genet. Med. 2021;24:1–14. doi: 10.1016/j.gim.2021.08.005. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Richardson E., McEwen A., Newton-John T., Crook A., Jacobs C. Incorporating patient perspectives in the development of a core outcome set for reproductive genetic carrier screening: A sequential systematic review. Eur. J. Hum. Genet. 2022;30:756–765. doi: 10.1038/s41431-022-01090-1. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources