Qualitative Study of Participation Facilitators and Barriers for Emergency School Meals and Pandemic Electronic Benefits (P-EBT) in an Urban Setting during COVID-19
- PMID: 36014864
- PMCID: PMC9416019
- DOI: 10.3390/nu14163358
Qualitative Study of Participation Facilitators and Barriers for Emergency School Meals and Pandemic Electronic Benefits (P-EBT) in an Urban Setting during COVID-19
Abstract
During the COVID-19 pandemic, significantly fewer of New York City's (NYC's) 1.1 million public school children participated in emergency grab-and-go meals-heightening the risk of inadequate nutrition security for many of NYC's most vulnerable residents. This study sought to examine student families' facilitators and barriers to participation in the grab-and-go meal service and their experiences with pandemic-electronic benefit transfer (P-EBT) funds, a cash benefit distributed when schools were closed. We recruited 126 parents of children in NYC public schools who had participated in the grab-and-go service. Using opened-ended questions, we interviewed 101 parents in 25 1-h online focus groups. We identified four main themes which broadly impacted school meal participation: communication, logistics, meal appeal, and personal circumstances. Key facilitating subthemes included clear communication, ease of accessing sites, and high variety. Key sub-themes negatively impacting participation included limited communication and low meal variety. Accurate, timely communication; easily accessible distribution locations; and convenient distribution times could have increased participation and satisfaction. For P-EBT, parents welcomed the funds and used them readily, but some experienced difficulties obtaining payments. The simultaneous inclusion of community-based research in the evaluation of emergency feeding programs could improve future outcomes for school meal participation and electronic benefits.
Keywords: COVID-19; emergency feeding policy considerations; nutrition security; parent perspectives; school meals.
Conflict of interest statement
J.W.C., T.T.T.N., M.R. and P.A.K. have no known conflict of interest. J.A.M., initially had no relationship with the funder when the study was first conceptualized, designed, and funding obtained. After the study commenced, J.A.M. was employed by the funder and assisted with the review and editing of the manuscript. However, given the nature of the study, the authors do not believe this constitutes a conflict of interest.
References
-
- Cuomo A. State of New York Executive Order 202.4. 3 March 2020. [(accessed on 15 May 2022)]; Available online: https://www.governor.ny.gov/sites/default/files/atoms/files/EO%20202.4.pdf.
-
- New York City Independent Budget Office Food to Go: Did NYC Open Grab & Go Sites in Areas with the Greatest Need? [(accessed on 15 May 2022)];2020 Available online: https://ibo.nyc.ny.us/iboreports/food-to-go-did-nyc-open-grab-and-go-sit....
-
- McLoughlin G.M., McCarthy J.A., McGuirt J.T., Singleton C.R., Dunn C.G., Gadhoke P. Addressing Food Insecurity through a Health Equity Lens: A Case Study of Large Urban School Districts during the COVID-19 Pandemic. J. Urban Health. 2020;97:759–775. doi: 10.1007/s11524-020-00476-0. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- United States Department of Agriculture What Is Nutrition Security? [(accessed on 9 August 2022)]; Available online: https://www.usda.gov/nutrition-security.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
