Cancer Immunotherapy and Delivery System: An Update
- PMID: 36015256
- PMCID: PMC9413869
- DOI: 10.3390/pharmaceutics14081630
Cancer Immunotherapy and Delivery System: An Update
Abstract
With an understanding of immunity in the tumor microenvironment, immunotherapy turns out to be a powerful tool in the clinic to treat many cancers. The strategies applied in cancer immunotherapy mainly include blockade of immune checkpoints, adoptive transfer of engineered cells, such as T cells, natural killer cells, and macrophages, cytokine therapy, cancer vaccines, and oncolytic virotherapy. Many factors, such as product price, off-target side effects, immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment, and cancer cell heterogeneity, affect the treatment efficacy of immunotherapies against cancers. In addition, some treatments, such as chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell therapy, are more effective in treating patients with lymphoma, leukemia, and multiple myeloma rather than solid tumors. To improve the efficacy of targeted immunotherapy and reduce off-target effects, delivery systems for immunotherapies have been developed in past decades using tools such as nanoparticles, hydrogel matrix, and implantable scaffolds. This review first summarizes the currently common immunotherapies and their limitations. It then synopsizes the relative delivery systems that can be applied to improve treatment efficacy and minimize side effects. The challenges, frontiers, and prospects for applying these delivery systems in cancer immunotherapy are also discussed. Finally, the application of these approaches in clinical trials is reviewed.
Keywords: T cell therapy; biomaterials; cancer immunotherapy; clinical application; delivery systems; intratumoral delivery; nanoparticles.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Figures


Similar articles
-
Surface-engineered nanoparticles in cancer immune response and immunotherapy: Current status and future prospects.Biomed Pharmacother. 2023 Jan;157:113998. doi: 10.1016/j.biopha.2022.113998. Epub 2022 Nov 15. Biomed Pharmacother. 2023. PMID: 36399829 Review.
-
Advances in immunotherapy delivery from implantable and injectable biomaterials.Acta Biomater. 2019 Apr 1;88:15-31. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2019.02.016. Epub 2019 Feb 13. Acta Biomater. 2019. PMID: 30771535 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Combinatorial approaches to effective therapy in glioblastoma (GBM): Current status and what the future holds.Int Rev Immunol. 2022;41(6):582-605. doi: 10.1080/08830185.2022.2101647. Epub 2022 Aug 8. Int Rev Immunol. 2022. PMID: 35938932 Review.
-
Implantable and Injectable Biomaterial Scaffolds for Cancer Immunotherapy.Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2020 Nov 30;8:612950. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2020.612950. eCollection 2020. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2020. PMID: 33330440 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Recent Advances in CAR-Based Solid Tumor Immunotherapy.Cells. 2023 Jun 11;12(12):1606. doi: 10.3390/cells12121606. Cells. 2023. PMID: 37371075 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Heterogeneity and efficacy of immunotherapy in multiple cancer: insights from a meta-analysis.Biol Proced Online. 2025 May 20;27(1):17. doi: 10.1186/s12575-025-00274-5. Biol Proced Online. 2025. PMID: 40389815 Free PMC article.
-
Emerging Targets and Therapeutics in Immuno-Oncology: Insights from Landscape Analysis.J Med Chem. 2024 Jun 13;67(11):8519-8544. doi: 10.1021/acs.jmedchem.4c00568. Epub 2024 May 24. J Med Chem. 2024. PMID: 38787632 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Current challenges and therapeutic advances of CAR-T cell therapy for solid tumors.Cancer Cell Int. 2024 Apr 15;24(1):133. doi: 10.1186/s12935-024-03315-3. Cancer Cell Int. 2024. PMID: 38622705 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Editorial: Complexity of tumor microenvironment: A major culprit in cancer development.Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2022 Oct 20;13:1059885. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2022.1059885. eCollection 2022. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2022. PMID: 36339412 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Knowledge mapping of immunotherapy for thyroid cancer from 1980 to 2022: A review.Medicine (Baltimore). 2023 Sep 29;102(39):e35506. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000035506. Medicine (Baltimore). 2023. PMID: 37773801 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- Emens L.A., Cruz C., Eder J.P., Braiteh F., Chung C., Tolaney S.M., Kuter I., Nanda R., Cassier P.A., Delord J.P., et al. Long-term Clinical Outcomes and Biomarker Analyses of Atezolizumab Therapy for Patients with Metastatic Triple-Negative Breast Cancer: A Phase 1 Study. JAMA Oncol. 2019;5:74–82. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2018.4224. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- Brufsky A., Kim S.B., Zvirbule Ž., Eniu A., Mebis J., Sohn J.H., Wongchenko M., Chohan S., Amin R., Yan Y., et al. A phase II randomized trial of cobimetinib plus chemotherapy, with or without atezolizumab, as first-line treatment for patients with locally advanced or metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (COLET): Primary analysis. Ann. Oncol. 2021;32:652–660. doi: 10.1016/j.annonc.2021.01.065. - DOI - PubMed
Publication types
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous