Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2022 Jul 28;10(8):1201.
doi: 10.3390/vaccines10081201.

A U.S. Government-Coordinated Effort to Leverage Non-Human Primate Data to Facilitate Ebolavirus Vaccine Development

Affiliations
Review

A U.S. Government-Coordinated Effort to Leverage Non-Human Primate Data to Facilitate Ebolavirus Vaccine Development

Kimberly L Taylor et al. Vaccines (Basel). .

Abstract

A United States Government (USG) interagency group, the Filovirus Animal Non-Clinical Group (FANG), has been established to support the development of biodefense medical countermeasures (MCMs). As both vaccines and therapeutics are licensed using "non-traditional pathways", such as the U.S. Food and Drug Administration's (FDA) Animal Rule (AR), non-human primate (NHP) models and associated assays have been developed and standardized across BSL4 testing sites to evaluate candidate products. Vaccine candidates are evaluated using these NHP models, and through this public-private partnership, a meta-analysis of NHP control data has been conducted and submitted to the FDA as a master file. This is an example of how existing NHP control data can be leveraged in lieu of conducting separate natural history studies at multiple testing facilities to demonstrate the consistency of a standardized animal model for vaccine development. As a result, animal use can be minimized and the duplication of effort avoided, thus reducing the amount of time needed to conduct additional studies, as well as the cost of vaccine candidate development. This successful strategy may be applied to other pathogens of high consequence for vaccine development, and shows how strategic preparedness for biodefense can be leveraged in response to outbreaks and public health emergencies.

Keywords: Animal Rule; FANG; ebolavirus; filovirus; non-human primate; public–private partnership; regulatory; vaccine development.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

    1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention History of Ebola Virus Disease (EVD) Outbreaks. [(accessed on 21 March 2022)]; Available online: https://www.cdc.gov/vhf/ebola/history/chronology.html.
    1. Henao-Restrepo A.M., Camacho A., Longini I.M., Watson C.H., Edmunds W.J., Egger M., Carroll M.W., Dean N.E., Diatta I., Doumbia M., et al. Efficacy and effectiveness of an rVSV-vectored vaccine in preventing Ebola virus disease: Final results from the Guinea ring vaccination, open-label, cluster-randomised trial (Ebola Ca Suffit!) Lancet. 2017;389:505–518. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)32621-6. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Geisbert T.W., Daddario-Dicaprio K.M., Geisbert J.B., Reed D.S., Feldmann F., Grolla A., Stroher U., Fritz E.A., Hensley L.E., Jones S.M., et al. Vesicular stomatitis virus-based vaccines protect nonhuman primates against aerosol challenge with Ebola and Marburg viruses. Vaccine. 2008;26:6894–6900. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2008.09.082. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Geisbert T.W., Feldmann H. Recombinant vesicular stomatitis virus-based vaccines against Ebola and Marburg virus infections. J. Infect. Dis. 2011;204((Suppl. S3)):S1075–S1081. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jir349. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Callendret B., Vellinga J., Wunderlich K., Rodriguez A., Steigerwald R., Dirmeier U., Cheminay C., Volkmann A., Brasel T., Carrion R., et al. A prophylactic multivalent vaccine against different filovirus species is immunogenic and provides protection from lethal infections with Ebolavirus and Marburgvirus species in non-human primates. PLoS ONE. 2018;13:e0192312. Erratum in PLoS ONE 2018, 13, e0196546. - PMC - PubMed