Quality assessment of clinical practice guidelines on psychological distress of cancer patients using the AGREE II instrument
- PMID: 36016612
- PMCID: PMC9396033
- DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.942219
Quality assessment of clinical practice guidelines on psychological distress of cancer patients using the AGREE II instrument
Abstract
Objective: This study aimed to assess the quality of the clinical practice guidelines on psychological distress among cancer patients and provide users with recommendations for coping with psychological distress.
Methods: A systematic search of relevant clinical practice guidelines was undertaken to identify and select the clinical practice guidelines related to psychological distress among cancer patients. Literature databases were searched in PubMed, Web of Science, Excerpta Medica Database, the Cumulative Index to Nursing & Allied Health Literature, China Biology Medicine, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, WanFang and Weipu Journal Database. The guideline databases include Yimaitong Guidelines Network, National Guideline Clearinghouse, National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), New Zealand Guidelines Group, Scottish Intercollegiate GuidelinesNetwork, American Psychological Association, Registered Nurses' Association of Ontario and Cancer Care Ontario (CCO). Four independent reviewers assessed the eligible guidelines using the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation (AGREE II) instrument.
Results: Six clinical practice guidelines were included and assessed for critical evaluation. The median score for the scope and purpose domain was 71.5% (IQR 64%-77.25%), the stakeholder involvement domain was 65% (IQR 47.5%-74.5%), the rigour of the development domain was 61.5% (IQR 45.5%-85.25%), the clarity of the presentation domain was 91% (IQR 72.25%-94.5%), the applicability domain was 70% (IQR 33%-78.75%), and the editorial independence domain was 48.84% (IQR 61.75%-95%). Four guidelines (ASCO, 2014; Canadian Association of Psychosocial Oncology, 2015; NCCN, 2020, and CCO, 2016) were classified as "recommended," and the remaining (European Palliative Care Research Collaborative and Chinese Psychosocial Oncology Society) were "recommended with modifications," especially in the domains of Stakeholder involvement, rigour of development, and applicability. The inter-rater consistency of each domain showed moderate level (0.52-0.90) analyzing by intraclass correlation.
Conclusions: The clinical practice guidelines on psychological distress among cancer patients varied in quality, and there were discrepancies in terms of the recommendations and recommendation grades. These findings could contribute to improving the quality of clinical practice guidelines on psychological distress, and enable the development and implementation of evidence-based guidelines for cancer patients.
Systematic review registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO, identifier CRD42020209204.
Keywords: AGREE II; cancer; clinical practice guideline; psychological distress; quality assessment.
Copyright © 2022 Hao, Jin, Zuo, Zhao, Hu and Qi.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Similar articles
-
Quality appraisal of clinical practice guidelines addressing massage interventions using the AGREE II instrument.Syst Rev. 2024 Mar 8;13(1):83. doi: 10.1186/s13643-024-02503-6. Syst Rev. 2024. PMID: 38459534 Free PMC article.
-
Clinical practice guidelines for the nutritional risk screening and assessment of cancer patients: a systematic quality appraisal using the AGREE II instrument.Support Care Cancer. 2021 Jun;29(6):2885-2893. doi: 10.1007/s00520-021-06094-z. Epub 2021 Feb 27. Support Care Cancer. 2021. PMID: 33638747 Review.
-
Quality appraisal of clinical practice guidelines for diabetes mellitus published in China between 2007 and 2017 using the AGREE II instrument.BMJ Open. 2019 Sep 4;9(9):e022392. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-022392. BMJ Open. 2019. PMID: 31488461 Free PMC article.
-
Quality appraisal of gestational diabetes mellitus guidelines with AGREE II: a systematic review.BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2019 Dec 5;19(1):478. doi: 10.1186/s12884-019-2597-8. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2019. PMID: 31805878 Free PMC article.
-
AGREE II Quality Assessment of National and International Clinical Practice Guidelines on Prostate Cancer Management by the OPTIMA Consortium.Eur Urol Open Sci. 2024 Nov 12;70:183-193. doi: 10.1016/j.euros.2024.10.020. eCollection 2024 Dec. Eur Urol Open Sci. 2024. PMID: 39611162 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Critical quality appraisal and algorithm development of clinical practice guidelines for management of poststroke sensory loss: a systematic review.BMJ Open. 2023 Nov 17;13(11):e074082. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-074082. BMJ Open. 2023. PMID: 37977862 Free PMC article.
References
Publication types
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources