Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Aug 18;36(16):9321-9328.
doi: 10.1021/acs.energyfuels.2c02086. Epub 2022 Jul 28.

A Lithium-Sulfur Battery Using Binder-Free Graphene-Coated Aluminum Current Collector

Affiliations

A Lithium-Sulfur Battery Using Binder-Free Graphene-Coated Aluminum Current Collector

Wolfgang Brehm et al. Energy Fuels. .

Abstract

Lithium-sulfur battery of practical interest requires thin-layer support to achieve acceptable volumetric energy density. However, the typical aluminum current collector of Li-ion battery cannot be efficiently used in the Li/S system due to the insulating nature of sulfur and a reaction mechanism involving electrodeposition of dissolved polysulfides. We study the electrochemical behavior of a Li/S battery using a carbon-coated Al current collector in which the low thickness, the high electronic conductivity, and, at the same time, the host ability for the reaction products are allowed by a binder-free few-layer graphene (FLG) substrate. The FLG enables a sulfur electrode having a thickness below 100 μm, fast kinetics, low impedance, and an initial capacity of 1000 mAh gS -1 with over 70% retention after 300 cycles. The Li/S cell using FLG shows volumetric and gravimetric energy densities of 300 Wh L-1 and 500 Wh kg-1, respectively, which are values well competing with commercially available Li-ion batteries.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing financial interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
(a) Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) image, (b) statistical lateral size distribution with Lorentzian fit, (c) atomic force microscopy (AFM) image, and (d) statistical thickness distribution of the FLG precursor. (e) Raman spectrum of the FLG precursor including graphite reference with (f) corresponding I(2D1)/I(G) vs I(2D2)/I(G) and (g) statistical Raman analysis of I(D)/I(G) vs FWHM(G). SEM images of (h) Al_FLGP_50 and (i) Al_FLGP_60 after coating and pressing. See Table 1 for the definition of the samples’ acronyms.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Cyclic voltammetry (CV) measurements with currents normalized to the weight of the sulfur in the electrodes using (a) bare Al, (b) Al_FLGP_50, and (c) Al_FLGP_60 in a potential window of 1.8–2.8 V vs Li+/Li at a scan rate of 0.1 mV s–1. Nyquist plots of the electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) performed at the OCV, and upon the first and fifth CV cycle of sulfur electrodes coated on (d) bare Al, (e) Al_FLGP_50, and (f) Al_FLGP_60 in a frequency range from 500 kHz to 0.1 Hz using a signal amplitude of 10 mV. Electrolyte: DOL:DME (1:1 w:w), LiTFSI (1 mol kg–1), LiNO3 (1 mol kg–1). Room temperature (25 °C). See Table 1 for samples’ acronyms.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Voltage profiles of Li/S cells cycled at a C/5 rate (1C = 1675 mA gS–1) using electrodes coated on (a) bare Al, (b) Al_FLGP_50, and (c) Al_FLGP_60. (d) Comparison of the corresponding discharge capacity trends upon cycling (left-side y-axis) and Coulombic efficiency (right-side y-axis). Electrolyte: DOL:DME (1:1 w:w), LiTFSI (1 mol kg–1), LiNO3 (1 mol kg–1). Voltage window 1.9–2.8 V. Room temperature (25 °C). See Table 1 for samples’ acronyms.
Figure 4
Figure 4
(a) Gravimetric (mAh g–1, left-side y-axis) and areal (mAh cm–2, right-side y-axis) capacities of the Li/S cell cycled at a C/5 rate (1C = 1675 mA gS–1) using a S-Al_FLGP_50 cathode with an areal sulfur loading increased up to ∼4.4 mg cm–2 (electrode geometric area of 1.54 cm2) and (b) voltage profile during a related cycle with the maximum capacity. Electrolyte: DOL:DME (1:1 w:w), LiTFSI (1 mol kg–1), LiNO3 (1 mol kg–1). Voltage window 1.7–2.8 V. Room temperature (25 °C). See Table 1 for samples’ acronyms.

References

    1. Lyu Y.; Wu X.; Wang K.; Feng Z.; Cheng T.; Liu Y.; Wang M.; Chen R.; Xu L.; Zhou J.; Lu Y.; Guo B. An Overview on the Advances of LiCoO2 Cathodes for Lithium-Ion Batteries. Adv. Energy Mater. 2021, 11, 2000982.10.1002/aenm.202000982. - DOI
    1. He W.; Guo W.; Wu H.; Lin L.; Liu Q.; Han X.; Xie Q.; Liu P.; Zheng H.; Wang L.; et al. Challenges and Recent Advances in High Capacity Li-Rich Cathode Materials for High Energy Density Lithium-Ion Batteries. Adv. Mater. 2021, 33, 2005937.10.1002/adma.202005937. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Nayak P. K.; Yang L.; Brehm W.; Adelhelm P. From Lithium-Ion to Sodium-Ion Batteries: Advantages, Challenges, and Surprises. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2018, 57, 102–120. 10.1002/anie.201703772. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Carbone L.; Greenbaum S. G.; Hassoun J. Lithium Sulfur and Lithium Oxygen Batteries: New Frontiers of Sustainable Energy Storage. Sustainable Energy Fuels 2017, 1, 228–247. 10.1039/C6SE00124F. - DOI
    1. Brehm W.; Santhosha A. L.; Zhang Z.; Neumann C.; Turchanin A.; Seyring M.; Rettenmayr M.; Buchheim J. R.; Adelhelm P. Mechanochemically Synthesized Cu3P/C Composites as a Conversion Electrode for Li-Ion and Na-Ion Batteries in Different Electrolytes. J. Power Sources Adv. 2020, 6, 10003110.1016/j.powera.2020.100031. - DOI

LinkOut - more resources