Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Jun 28;4(8):100512.
doi: 10.1016/j.xkme.2022.100512. eCollection 2022 Aug.

Efficacy of Difelikefalin for the Treatment of Moderate to Severe Pruritus in Hemodialysis Patients: Pooled Analysis of KALM-1 and KALM-2 Phase 3 Studies

Affiliations

Efficacy of Difelikefalin for the Treatment of Moderate to Severe Pruritus in Hemodialysis Patients: Pooled Analysis of KALM-1 and KALM-2 Phase 3 Studies

Joel Topf et al. Kidney Med. .

Abstract

Rationale & objective: Chronic kidney disease-associated pruritus (CKD-aP) in patients treated by hemodialysis (HD) impairs quality of life (QoL). Difelikefalin, a selective κ-opioid receptor agonist, decreased the intensity of CKD-aP in patients undergoing HD. This pooled analysis evaluated difelikefalin's efficacy and the itch-related QoL overall and in subgroups defined by demographics or disease characteristics.

Study design: In KALM-1 and KALM-2, participants were randomized (1:1) to receive intravenous difelikefalin or placebo 3 times/wk for 12 weeks, followed by a 52-week open-label extension.

Setting & participants: Adults with moderate to severe CKD-aP treated by HD in North America, Europe, and the Asia-Pacific region.

Intervention: Intravenous difelikefalin at 0.5 mcg/kg or placebo.

Outcomes: Itch intensity (Worst Itching Intensity Numerical Rating Scale [WI-NRS]) and itch-related QoL (Skindex-10 and 5-D Itch questionnaires).

Results: 851 participants were randomized (difelikefalin, n = 426; placebo, n = 425). This pooled analysis demonstrated early (week 1), sustained difelikefalin efficacy, with significantly greater achievement of ≥3-point WI-NRS reduction with difelikefalin (51.1%) versus placebo (35.2%; P < 0.001). Achievement of a ≥4-point WI-NRS reduction was significantly greater with difelikefalin (38.7%) versus placebo (23.4%; P < 0.001). Difelikefalin reduced itch intensity in subgroups based on age, sex, anti-itch medication use, the presence of specific medical conditions, and gabapentin or pregabalin use. More participants receiving difelikefalin versus placebo achieved clinically meaningful decreases of ≥15 points on the Skindex-10 scale (55.5% vs 40.5%, respectively; P < 0.001) and ≥5 points on the 5-D Itch scale (52.1% vs 42.3%, respectively; P = 0.01), with sustained 5-D Itch effects up to 64 weeks.

Limitations: Subgroup samples were small. The WI-NRS, Skindex-10, and 5-D Itch are not used in routine clinical care of dialysis patients; therefore, findings may not reflect the real-world effectiveness of difelikefalin.

Conclusions: Difelikefalin demonstrated rapid, sustained efficacy, with consistent results in diverse populations of patients treated by HD.

Funding: Cara Therapeutics, Inc.

Trial registration: The KALM-1 trial is registered as NCT03422653 and the KALM-2 trial is registered as NCT03636269.

Keywords: Chronic kidney disease; difelikefalin; efficacy; pruritus; κ-opioid receptor.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

None
Graphical abstract
Figure 1
Figure 1
Participant dispositions in the pooled KALM-1 and KALM-2 studies. There were 2 participants in the placebo group and 3 participants in the difelikefalin group who discontinued due to a lack of eligibility after randomization.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Proportions of participants with (A) A ≥3-point reduction in the weekly mean of the daily Worst Itching Intensity Numerical Rating Scale (WI-NRS) scores over 12 weeks, (B) A ≥4-point reduction in the weekly mean of the daily WI-NRS scores over 12 weeks, and (C) ≥3-point and ≥4-point reductions in weekly mean WI-NRS scores at week 12. ∗P < 0.05 and ∗∗P < 0.001 difelikefalin versus placebo. Differences between placebo and difelikefalin with respect to proportions were analyzed using a logistic regression model with terms for the treatment group, baseline WI-NRS score, use of an anti-itch medication during the week before randomization, presence of specific medical conditions, and geographic region. Missing weekly WI-NRS scores were imputed by multiple imputation under a missing-at-random assumption. Abbreviations: CI, confidence interval; LS, least squares; WI-NRS, Worst Itching Intensity Numerical Rating Scale.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Achievement of complete response on the Worst Itching Intensity Numerical Rating Scale (WI-NRS) over 12 weeks. ∗P < 0.05 and ∗∗P < 0.001 difelikefalin versus placebo. A complete response was defined as ≥80% of daily WI-NRS scores being equal to 0 or 1 for the preceding week. Differences between placebo and difelikefalin with respect to proportions were analyzed using a logistic regression model containing terms for the treatment group, baseline WI-NRS score, use of an anti-itch medication during the week before randomization, presence of specific medical conditions, and geographic region. Missing weekly WI-NRS scores were imputed by multiple imputation under a missing-at-random assumption. Abbreviations: CI, confidence interval; LS, least squares; WI-NRS, Worst Itching Intensity Numerical Rating Scale.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Achievement of clinically meaningful improvements in (A) Skindex-10 and (B) 5-D Itch total scores over 12 weeks. ∗P ≤ 0.05 and ∗∗P ≤ 0.001 difelikefalin versus placebo. Differences between placebo and difelikefalin with respect to proportions were analyzed using a logistic regression model containing terms for the treatment group, baseline score, use of an anti-itch medication during the week before randomization, presence of specific medical conditions, and geographic region. Missing values were not imputed. Clinically meaningful thresholds were determined as ≥15-point reductions in Skindex-10 and ≥5-point reductions in 5-D Itch total scores (unpublished data). Abbreviations: CI, confidence interval; LS, least squares.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Achievement of a ≥5-point improvement in 5-D Itch total score in the pooled KALM-1 and KALM-2 studies. Data given as n and N indicate the number of participants who achieved a ≥5-point improvement in the 5-D Itch total score and the total number of participants assessed at each time point, respectively. Data as observed. ∗Week 12 of the double-blind period and week 1 of the open-label extension period, during which participants taking placebo during the double-blind period switched to active treatment with difelikefalin. In KALM-2, in addition to the participants who discontinued from the open-label extension period, 313 of 399 (78.4%) participants could not complete the 52-week open-label extension period because of the sponsor’s decision to stop the study for reasons unrelated to safety or a lack of drug effects. A 2-week discontinuation following the end of the double-blind period of KALM-1 is not pictured in the figure. Abbreviation: OLE, open-label extension.
Figure 6
Figure 6
Subgroup analyses for ≥3-point Worst Itching Intensity Numerical Rating Scale (WI-NRS) responses at week 12. ∗Prior gabapentinoid use values include participants who used gabapentin or pregabalin for any condition, including itch. Differences between placebo and difelikefalin with respect to proportions were analyzed using a logistic regression model containing terms for the treatment group, baseline WI-NRS score, use of an anti-itch medication during the week before randomization, presence of specific medical conditions, and geographic region. Missing weekly WI-NRS scores were imputed by multiple imputation under a missing-at-random assumption. Abbreviations: CI, confidence interval; OR, odds ratio; WI-NRS, Worst Itching Intensity Numerical Rating Scale.

References

    1. Mettang T., Kremer A.E. Uremic pruritus. Kidney Int. 2015;87(4):685–691. - PubMed
    1. Pisoni R.L., Wikström B., Elder S.J., et al. Pruritus in haemodialysis patients: international results from the Dialysis Outcomes and Practice Patterns Study (DOPPS) Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2006;21(12):3495–3505. - PubMed
    1. Rayner H.C., Larkina M., Wang M., et al. International comparisons of prevalence, awareness, and treatment of pruritus in people on hemodialysis. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2017;12(12):2000–2007. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Sukul N., Karaboyas A., Csomor P.A., et al. Self-reported pruritus and clinical, dialysis-related, and patient-reported outcomes in hemodialysis patients. Kidney Med. 2021;3(1):42–53.e1. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Satti M.Z., Arshad D., Javed H., et al. Uremic pruritus: prevalence and impact on quality of life and depressive symptoms in hemodialysis patients. Cureus. 2019;11(7):e5178. - PMC - PubMed

Associated data