Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Jul 22;14(7):e27142.
doi: 10.7759/cureus.27142. eCollection 2022 Jul.

Prevalence of Dry Eye Disease and Its Association With the Frequent Usage of Eye Cosmetics Among Women

Norah A Albdaya  1 , Faris H Binyousef  1 , Maha H Alrashid  1 , Abdullah A Alajlan  1 , Faisal A Alsharif  1 , Sulaiman K Alfouzan  1 , Reem R Alhuthail  2
Affiliations

Prevalence of Dry Eye Disease and Its Association With the Frequent Usage of Eye Cosmetics Among Women

Norah A Albdaya et al. Cureus. .

Abstract

Purpose: Dry eye disease (DED) is defined as a disease of the tear film and ocular surface that leads to discomfort and visual disturbance. The diagnosis of DED mainly depends on the presenting clinical features. A delay in treatment may progress into chronic eye disease. This study aimed to estimate the prevalence of dry eye symptoms among eye cosmetic users in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.

Methods: This cross-sectional study involved adult Saudi females using eye cosmetics. The Ocular Surface Disease Index questionnaire was used to assess DED.

Results: A total of 207 responses were included in this study. DED symptoms were reported among those who used eye cosmetics suggesting their effect on the tear film and its stability. This study demonstrated that mascara is the most common cosmetic used, with a prevalence of 98.6%. The prevalence of dry eye syndrome (DES) was 71.6%, where 40.5%, 13.5%, and 17.6% had severe, moderate, and mild conditions, respectively. The frequency of using inner eyeliner significantly increased the prevalence of DES, in which those who used it daily accounted for 75%. In contrast, the results showed no correlation between the frequency of using mascara or external eyeliner and the prevalence of DES.

Conclusion: The prevalence of DED among women who used eye cosmetics was much higher than its prevalence in the general population, which indicates that eye cosmetics are one of the risk factors in the development of DED. Also, the severity of DED was significantly higher in women who did not use a cleanser for removing cosmetics.

Keywords: cornea; dry eye disease; dry eye syndrome; eyeshadow; mascara.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Prevalence of DES according to the OSDI tool and severity of conditions
DES, dry eye syndrome; OSDI, Ocular Surface Disease Index
Figure 2
Figure 2. Cosmetics with the most negative impact on eye dryness according to participants
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. The definition and classification of dry eye disease: report of the Definition and Classification Subcommittee of the 2007 International Dry Eye Workshop. Lemp MA, Foulks GN. Ocul Surf. 2007;5:75–92. - PubMed
    1. Comparison of two questionnaires for dry eye symptom assessment: the Ocular Surface Disease Index and the Symptom Assessment in Dry Eye. Amparo F, Schaumberg DA, Dana R. Ophthalmology. 2015;122:1498–1503. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Prevalence and risk factors of dry eye symptoms in a Saudi Arabian population. Alshamrani AA, Almousa AS, Almulhim AA, et al. Middle East Afr J Ophthalmol. 2017;24:67–73. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Prevalence and determinants of dry eye disease among 40 years and older population of Riyadh (except capital), Saudi Arabia. Yasir ZH, Chauhan D, Khandekar R, Souru C, Varghese S. Middle East Afr J Ophthalmol. 2019;26:27–32. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Prevalence of diagnosed dry eye disease in the United States among adults aged 18 years and older. Farrand KF, Fridman M, Stillman IÖ, Schaumberg DA. Am J Ophthalmol. 2017;182:90–98. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources