Surface decontamination protocols for surgical treatment of peri-implantitis: A systematic review with meta-analysis
- PMID: 36017594
- PMCID: PMC9825968
- DOI: 10.1111/clr.13992
Surface decontamination protocols for surgical treatment of peri-implantitis: A systematic review with meta-analysis
Abstract
Objective: To answer the following PICO question: "In patients requiring surgical treatment of peri-implantitis (P), is any implant surface decontamination protocol (I) superior to others (C) in terms of clinical and radiographic parameters (O)?"
Methods: Randomized clinical trials (RCTs) comparing two or more decontamination protocols as part of the surgical treatment of peri-implantitis were included. Two authors independently searched for eligible studies, screened titles and abstracts, did full-text analysis, extracted data, and performed the risk-of-bias assessment. Whenever possible, results were summarized through random effects meta-analyses.
Results: Twenty-two manuscripts reporting on 16 RCTs were included, testing mechanical, chemical and physical decontamination protocols. All of them resulted in an improvement in clinical parameters; however, the superiority of specific protocols over others is mainly based on single RCTs. The use of titanium brushes and implantoplasty showed favorable results as single decontamination methods. Meta-analyses indicated a lack of added effect of Er:Yag laser on probing pocket depth (PPD) reduction (n = 2, WMD = -0.24 mm, 95% confidence interval [CI] [-1.10; 0.63], p = .59); while systemic antimicrobials (amoxicillin or azithromycin) showed an added effect on treatment success ([PPD ≤5 mm, no bleeding or suppuration, no progressive bone loss]; n = 2, RR = 1.84, 95% CI [1.17;2.91], p = .008), but not in terms of PPD reduction (n = 2, WMD = 0.93 mm, 95% CI [-0.69; 2.55], p = .26), even if with substantial heterogeneity.
Conclusions: No single decontamination method demonstrated clear evidence of superiority compared to the others. Systemic antibiotics, but not Er:Yag laser, may provide short-term clinical benefits in terms of treatment success (CRD42020182303).
Keywords: air-powder devices; curettes; decontamination; dental implants; implantoplasty; peri-implant diseases; surgical therapy; titanium brushes.
© 2022 The Authors. Clinical Oral Implants Research published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Figures



References
-
- Albaker, A. M. , ArRejaie, A. S. , Alrabiah, M. , Al‐Aali, K. A. , Mokeem, S. , Alasqah, M. N. , Vohra, F. , & Abduljabbar, T. (2018). Effect of antimicrobial photodynamic therapy in open flap debridement in the treatment of peri‐implantitis: A randomized controlled trial. Photodiagnosis and Photodynamic Therapy, 23, 71–74. 10.1016/j.pdpdt.2018.05.003 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Berglundh, T. , Armitage, G. , Araujo, M. G. , Avila‐Ortiz, G. , Blanco, J. , Camargo, P. M. , Chen, S. , Cochran, D. , Derks, J. , Figuero, E. , Hämmerle, C. H. F. , Heitz‐Mayfield, L. J. A. , Huynh‐Ba, G. , Iacono, V. , Koo, K.‐T. , Lambert, F. , McCauley, L. , Quirynen, M. , Renvert, S. , … Zitzmann, N. (2018). Peri‐implant diseases and conditions: Consensus report of workgroup 4 of the 2017 world workshop on the classification of periodontal and peri‐implant diseases and conditions. Journal of Clinical Periodontology, 45(S20), S286–S291. 10.1111/jcpe.12957 - DOI - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources