Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2022 Nov;33(11):1069-1086.
doi: 10.1111/clr.13992. Epub 2022 Sep 7.

Surface decontamination protocols for surgical treatment of peri-implantitis: A systematic review with meta-analysis

Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Surface decontamination protocols for surgical treatment of peri-implantitis: A systematic review with meta-analysis

Giacomo Baima et al. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2022 Nov.

Abstract

Objective: To answer the following PICO question: "In patients requiring surgical treatment of peri-implantitis (P), is any implant surface decontamination protocol (I) superior to others (C) in terms of clinical and radiographic parameters (O)?"

Methods: Randomized clinical trials (RCTs) comparing two or more decontamination protocols as part of the surgical treatment of peri-implantitis were included. Two authors independently searched for eligible studies, screened titles and abstracts, did full-text analysis, extracted data, and performed the risk-of-bias assessment. Whenever possible, results were summarized through random effects meta-analyses.

Results: Twenty-two manuscripts reporting on 16 RCTs were included, testing mechanical, chemical and physical decontamination protocols. All of them resulted in an improvement in clinical parameters; however, the superiority of specific protocols over others is mainly based on single RCTs. The use of titanium brushes and implantoplasty showed favorable results as single decontamination methods. Meta-analyses indicated a lack of added effect of Er:Yag laser on probing pocket depth (PPD) reduction (n = 2, WMD = -0.24 mm, 95% confidence interval [CI] [-1.10; 0.63], p = .59); while systemic antimicrobials (amoxicillin or azithromycin) showed an added effect on treatment success ([PPD ≤5 mm, no bleeding or suppuration, no progressive bone loss]; n = 2, RR = 1.84, 95% CI [1.17;2.91], p = .008), but not in terms of PPD reduction (n = 2, WMD = 0.93 mm, 95% CI [-0.69; 2.55], p = .26), even if with substantial heterogeneity.

Conclusions: No single decontamination method demonstrated clear evidence of superiority compared to the others. Systemic antibiotics, but not Er:Yag laser, may provide short-term clinical benefits in terms of treatment success (CRD42020182303).

Keywords: air-powder devices; curettes; decontamination; dental implants; implantoplasty; peri-implant diseases; surgical therapy; titanium brushes.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Risk of bias assessment
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
Meta‐analyses for the effect of different decontamination protocols tested in 2 or more RCTs. A‐C: effect of the single use of curettes in access flap surgery on PPD reduction, MBL change and treatment success. D‐F: effect of systemic antibiotics (AB) in addition to mechanical decontamination in access flap surgery on PPD reduction, MBL change and treatment success; in parenthesis are reported other eventual chemical decontaminants used in association with AB. G‐I: effect of 0.12% chlorhexidine (CHX) and 0.05% cetylpyridinium chloride (CPC) in addition to mechanical decontamination in resective surgery on PPD reduction, MBL change and treatment success. L: effect of Er:Yag laser in addition to mechanical and/or chemical decontamination in combined surgery on PPD reduction.
FIGURE 3
FIGURE 3
Meta‐analyses for the comparison among different decontamination protocols reported in 2 or more RCTs. A‐B: added effect of systemic antibiotics (AB) over mechanical decontamination in access flap surgery on PPD reduction and treatment success. C: added effect of Er:Yag laser in addition to mechanical and/or chemical decontamination in combined surgery on PPD reduction.

References

    1. Albaker, A. M. , ArRejaie, A. S. , Alrabiah, M. , Al‐Aali, K. A. , Mokeem, S. , Alasqah, M. N. , Vohra, F. , & Abduljabbar, T. (2018). Effect of antimicrobial photodynamic therapy in open flap debridement in the treatment of peri‐implantitis: A randomized controlled trial. Photodiagnosis and Photodynamic Therapy, 23, 71–74. 10.1016/j.pdpdt.2018.05.003 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Berglundh, T. , Armitage, G. , Araujo, M. G. , Avila‐Ortiz, G. , Blanco, J. , Camargo, P. M. , Chen, S. , Cochran, D. , Derks, J. , Figuero, E. , Hämmerle, C. H. F. , Heitz‐Mayfield, L. J. A. , Huynh‐Ba, G. , Iacono, V. , Koo, K.‐T. , Lambert, F. , McCauley, L. , Quirynen, M. , Renvert, S. , … Zitzmann, N. (2018). Peri‐implant diseases and conditions: Consensus report of workgroup 4 of the 2017 world workshop on the classification of periodontal and peri‐implant diseases and conditions. Journal of Clinical Periodontology, 45(S20), S286–S291. 10.1111/jcpe.12957 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Berglundh, T. , Wennström, J. L. , & Lindhe, J. (2018). Long‐term outcome of surgical treatment of peri‐implantitis. A 2‐11‐year retrospective study. Clinical Oral Implants Research, 29(4), 404–410. 10.1111/clr.13138 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Campbell, M. K. , Piaggio, G. , Elbourne, D. R. , Altman, D. G. , & CONSORT Group . (2012). Consort 2010 statement: Extension to cluster randomised trials. BMJ (Clinical Research Ed.), 345, e5661. 10.1136/bmj.e5661 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Carcuac, O. , Derks, J. , Abrahamsson, I. , Wennström, J. L. , Petzold, M. , & Berglundh, T. (2017). Surgical treatment of peri‐implantitis: 3‐Year results from a randomized controlled clinical trial. Journal of Clinical Periodontology, 44(12), 1294–1303. 10.1111/jcpe.12813 - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources