INTESTINAL DAMAGE AND IMMUNE RESPONSE AFTER EXPERIMENTAL BLUNT ABDOMINAL TRAUMA
- PMID: 36018298
- DOI: 10.1097/SHK.0000000000001986
INTESTINAL DAMAGE AND IMMUNE RESPONSE AFTER EXPERIMENTAL BLUNT ABDOMINAL TRAUMA
Abstract
Abdominal trauma (AT) is of major global importance, particularly because the civil, terroristic, and military traumatic potential of blast injuries has increased. The consequences of blunt abdominal injuries are highly variable and frequently underestimated or even overlooked. However, the underlying path mechanisms and subsequent innate immune response remain poorly understood. Therefore, we investigated the spatiotemporal local and systemic effects of a standardized blast-induced blunt AT on the intestine and innate immune response. In an established AT model, 66 male C57Bl6 mice were anesthetized and exposed to either a single blast wave centered on the epigastrium or control treatment (sham). At 2, 6, or 24 hours after trauma induction, animals were sacrificed. In 16 of 44 (36%) AT animals, one or more macroscopically visible injuries of the intestine were observed. Epithelial damage was detected by histological analysis of jejunum and ileum tissue samples, quantified by the Chiu score and by increased plasma concentrations of the intestinal fatty acid-binding protein, an enterocyte damage marker. Moreover, in the early posttraumatic period, elevated syndecan-1, claudin-5, and mucin-2 plasma levels also indicated alterations in the gut-blood barrier. Increased levels of pro-inflammatory cytokines such as TNF and macrophage inflammatory protein 2 in tissue homogenates and plasma indicate a systemic immune activation after blunt AT. In conclusion, we detected early morphological intestinal damage associated with high, early detectable intestinal fatty acid-binding protein plasma levels, and a considerable time- and dose-dependent impairment of the gut-blood barrier in a newly established mouse model of blunt AT. It appears to be a sufficient model for further studies of the intestinal immunopathophysiological consequences of AT and the evaluation of novel therapeutic approaches.
Copyright © 2022 by the Shock Society.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors report no conflicts of interest.
References
-
- Prichayudh S, Rassamee P, Sriussadaporn S, Pak-Art R, Sriussadaporn S, Kritayakirana K, Samorn P, Narueponjirakul N, Uthaipaisanwong A: Abdominal vascular injuries: blunt vs. penetrating. Injury 50(1):137–141, 2019.
-
- El-Menyar A, Abdelrahman H, Al-Hassani A, Peralta R, AbdelAziz H, Latifi R, Al-Thani H: Single versus multiple solid organ injuries following blunt abdominal trauma. World J Surg 41(11):2689–2696, 2017.
-
- Ferrah N, Cameron P, Gabbe B, Fitzgerald M, Martin K, Beck B: Trends in the nature and management of serious abdominal trauma. World J Surg 43(5):1216–1225, 2019.
-
- Yu YR, DeMello AS, Greeley CS, Cox CS, Naik-Mathuria BJ, Wesson DE: Injury patterns of child abuse: experience of two level 1 pediatric trauma centers. J Pediatr Surg 53(5):1028–1032, 2018.
-
- Tanaka C, Tagami T, Matsumoto H, Matsuda K, Kim S, Moroe Y, Fukuda R, Unemoto K, Yokota H: Recent trends in 30-day mortality in patients with blunt splenic injury: a nationwide trauma database study in Japan. PLoS One 12(9):e0184690, 2017.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials