Use of a Digital Assistant to Report COVID-19 Rapid Antigen Self-test Results to Health Departments in 6 US Communities
- PMID: 36018589
- PMCID: PMC9419013
- DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.28885
Use of a Digital Assistant to Report COVID-19 Rapid Antigen Self-test Results to Health Departments in 6 US Communities
Abstract
Importance: Widespread distribution of rapid antigen tests is integral to the US strategy to address COVID-19; however, it is estimated that few rapid antigen test results are reported to local departments of health.
Objective: To characterize how often individuals in 6 communities throughout the United States used a digital assistant to log rapid antigen test results and report them to their local departments of health.
Design, setting, and participants: This prospective cohort study is based on anonymously collected data from the beneficiaries of the Say Yes! Covid Test program, which distributed more than 3 000 000 rapid antigen tests at no cost to residents of 6 communities (Louisville, Kentucky; Indianapolis, Indiana; Fulton County, Georgia; O'ahu, Hawaii; Ann Arbor and Ypsilanti, Michigan; and Chattanooga, Tennessee) between April and October 2021. A descriptive evaluation of beneficiary use of a digital assistant for logging and reporting their rapid antigen test results was performed.
Interventions: Widespread community distribution of rapid antigen tests.
Main outcomes and measures: Number and proportion of tests logged and reported to the local department of health through the digital assistant.
Results: A total of 313 000 test kits were distributed, including 178 785 test kits that were ordered using the digital assistant. Among all distributed kits, 14 398 households (4.6%) used the digital assistant, but beneficiaries reported three-quarters of their rapid antigen test results to their state public health departments (30 965 tests reported of 41 465 total test results [75.0%]). The reporting behavior varied by community and was significantly higher among communities that were incentivized for reporting test results vs those that were not incentivized or partially incentivized (90.5% [95% CI, 89.9%-91.2%] vs 70.5%; [95% CI, 70.0%-71.0%]). In all communities, positive tests were less frequently reported than negative tests (60.4% [95% CI, 58.1%-62.8%] vs 75.5% [95% CI, 75.1%-76.0%]).
Conclusions and relevance: These results suggest that application-based reporting with incentives may be associated with increased reporting of rapid tests for COVID-19. However, increasing the adoption of the digital assistant may be a critical first step.
Conflict of interest statement
Figures
Update of
-
If you build it, will they use it? Use of a Digital Assistant for Self-Reporting of COVID-19 Rapid Antigen Test Results during Large Nationwide Community Testing Initiative.medRxiv [Preprint]. 2022 Apr 1:2022.03.31.22273242. doi: 10.1101/2022.03.31.22273242. medRxiv. 2022. Update in: JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Aug 1;5(8):e2228885. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.28885. PMID: 35411338 Free PMC article. Updated. Preprint.
References
-
- The White House Fact sheet: the Biden Administration to begin distributing at-home, rapid COVID-19 tests to Americans for free. Accessed July 26, 2022. https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefing-room/statements-releases/2022/01/14/...
-
- Collins F. Learning to protect communities with COVID-19 home testing programs. National Institutes of Health. Accessed July 26, 2022. https://directorsblog.nih.gov/2021/10/07/learning-to-protect-communities...
-
- Say yes: COVID test: keep our communities safe. Accessed March 28, 2022. https://sayyescovidtest.org/
-
- Fleurence RL, DiNenno EA, Riley WT, McMahon MJ, Lauer MS. CDC–NIH initiative provides free COVID-19 rapid home tests in North Carolina, Tennessee. HealthAffairs. Accessed July 26, 2022. https://www.healthaffairs.org/do/10.1377/forefront.20211025.437195/full/ - DOI
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous
