Prevalence of gross lesions and handling practices in pigs and their association with pork quality, Kiambu, Kenya
- PMID: 36026517
- PMCID: PMC9417192
- DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0272951
Prevalence of gross lesions and handling practices in pigs and their association with pork quality, Kiambu, Kenya
Abstract
Pre-slaughter handling of pigs has been documented to affect the quality of meat though no studies have investigated this relationship in the Kenyan context. This study aimed to determine the prevalence of gross lesions and practices related to sub-optimal welfare in pigs presented for slaughter while analyzing the relationship between occurrence of these lesions and meat quality. A cross-sectional study was conducted at a medium scale, non-integrated pig abattoir supplying to the Nairobi market, with a capacity to slaughter approximately 40 pigs a day. Data on welfare-associated lesions and handling practices were obtained from 529 pig carcasses and traders respectively. 387 pork samples were collected, and their quality evaluated by measuring their pH, meat color and drip loss. These three parameters were used to classify pork into four recognized categories namely: Red, Firm, Non-exudative (RFN), Pale Soft Exudative (PSE), Dark Firm Dry (DFD) and Red Soft Exudative (RSE). Almost all pigs were inefficiently stunned as evidenced by the presence of consciousness post-stunning. The majority of pigs (82.97%) having one or more welfare-associated gross lesions. Other animal welfare malpractices observed were high loading density and inadequate rest periods between transport and slaughter. A quarter of the pork samples were of sub-optimal quality including: RSE (11.36%), PSE (2.58%) and DFD (2.58%). Multinomial logistic regression revealed that pork originating from pigs transported at a high loading density had increased odds of being classified as DFD (OR 13.41, 95% CI 2.59-69.46). The findings indicate the need to educate stakeholders in the pork value chains on improved pig handling before and during slaughter to enhance pig welfare pre-slaughter and pork quality post-slaughter. Animal welfare legislation enforcement and implementation was observed to be insufficient. There is a need to educate key stakeholders on its importance of being put into practice both from economic and welfare perspectives.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Figures
References
-
- Szűcs I, Vida V. Global tendencies in pork meat—production, trade and consumption. Appl Stud Agribus Commer. 2017;11: 105–111. doi: 10.19041/apstract/2017/3-4/15 - DOI
-
- FAO. Livestock Country Reviews. FAO Animal Production and Health Livestock Country Reviews. No. 3. Rome. Authors’. 2012.
-
- Nantima N, Ocaido M, Davies J, Dione M, Okoth E, Mugisha A, et al. Characterization of smallholder pig production systems in four districts along the Uganda-Kenya border. Livest Res Rural Dev. 2015;27.
-
- FAO. State Of Food and Agriculture. FAO. Rome; 2011. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-44988-9_8 - DOI
-
- Mosoti Mburugu. THE PORK VALUE CHAIN:A Review of the actors and the business opportunities in the sector,in Kenya. 2014; 1–11.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
