Updated Overall Survival and Exploratory Analysis From Randomized, Phase II EVAN Study of Erlotinib Versus Vinorelbine Plus Cisplatin Adjuvant Therapy in Stage IIIA Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor+ Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer
- PMID: 36027483
- DOI: 10.1200/JCO.22.00428
Updated Overall Survival and Exploratory Analysis From Randomized, Phase II EVAN Study of Erlotinib Versus Vinorelbine Plus Cisplatin Adjuvant Therapy in Stage IIIA Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor+ Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer
Abstract
Clinical trials frequently include multiple end points that mature at different times. The initial report, typically based on the primary end point, may be published when key planned co-primary or secondary analyses are not yet available. Clinical Trial Updates provide an opportunity to disseminate additional results from studies, published in JCO or elsewhere, for which the primary end point has already been reported.The randomized, open-label, phase II EVAN study investigated the efficacy (disease-free survival [DFS] and 5-year overall survival [OS]) and safety of erlotinib versus vinorelbine/cisplatin as adjuvant chemotherapy after complete resection (R0) for stage III epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation+ non-small-cell lung cancer. We describe the updated results at the 43-month follow-up. In EVAN, patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to erlotinib (n = 51) or vinorelbine/cisplatin (n = 51). The median follow-up was 54.8 and 63.9 months in the erlotinib and chemotherapy arms, respectively. With erlotinib, the respective 5-year DFS by Kaplan-Meier analysis was 48.2% (95% CI, 29.4 to 64.7) and 46.2% (95% CI, 27.6 to 62.9) in the intention-to-treat and per-protocol populations. The median OS was 84.2 months with erlotinib versus 61.1 months with chemotherapy (hazard ratio, 0.318; 95% CI, 0.151 to 0.670). The 5-year survival rates were 84.8% and 51.1% with erlotinib and chemotherapy, respectively. In whole-exome sequencing analysis, frequent genes with variants co-occurring at baseline were TP53, MUC16, FAM104B, KMT5A, and DNAH9. With erlotinib, a single-nucleotide polymorphism mutation in UBXN11 was associated with significantly worse DFS (P = .01). To our knowledge, this study is the first to demonstrate clinically meaningful OS improvement with adjuvant erlotinib compared with chemotherapy in R0 stage III EGFR+ non-small-cell lung cancer.
Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01683175.
Similar articles
-
Erlotinib versus vinorelbine plus cisplatin as adjuvant therapy in Chinese patients with stage IIIA EGFR mutation-positive non-small-cell lung cancer (EVAN): a randomised, open-label, phase 2 trial.Lancet Respir Med. 2018 Nov;6(11):863-873. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(18)30277-7. Epub 2018 Aug 24. Lancet Respir Med. 2018. PMID: 30150014 Clinical Trial.
-
Gefitinib Versus Vinorelbine Plus Cisplatin as Adjuvant Treatment for Stage II-IIIA (N1-N2) EGFR-Mutant NSCLC: Final Overall Survival Analysis of CTONG1104 Phase III Trial.J Clin Oncol. 2021 Mar 1;39(7):713-722. doi: 10.1200/JCO.20.01820. Epub 2020 Dec 17. J Clin Oncol. 2021. PMID: 33332190 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Erlotinib Versus Gemcitabine Plus Cisplatin as Neoadjuvant Treatment of Stage IIIA-N2 EGFR-Mutant Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer (EMERGING-CTONG 1103): A Randomized Phase II Study.J Clin Oncol. 2019 Sep 1;37(25):2235-2245. doi: 10.1200/JCO.19.00075. Epub 2019 Jun 13. J Clin Oncol. 2019. PMID: 31194613 Clinical Trial.
-
Gefitinib versus vinorelbine plus cisplatin as adjuvant treatment for stage II-IIIA (N1-N2) EGFR-mutant NSCLC (ADJUVANT/CTONG1104): a randomised, open-label, phase 3 study.Lancet Oncol. 2018 Jan;19(1):139-148. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(17)30729-5. Epub 2017 Nov 21. Lancet Oncol. 2018. PMID: 29174310 Clinical Trial.
-
Randomized Phase III Study of Gefitinib Versus Cisplatin Plus Vinorelbine for Patients With Resected Stage II-IIIA Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer With EGFR Mutation (IMPACT).J Clin Oncol. 2022 Jan 20;40(3):231-241. doi: 10.1200/JCO.21.01729. Epub 2021 Nov 2. J Clin Oncol. 2022. PMID: 34726958 Clinical Trial.
Cited by
-
A real-world study comparing perioperative chemotherapy and EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitors for treatment of resected stage III EGFR-mutant adenocarcinoma.BMC Cancer. 2023 Sep 11;23(1):847. doi: 10.1186/s12885-023-11342-y. BMC Cancer. 2023. PMID: 37697233 Free PMC article.
-
Monitoring of Circulating Tumor DNA and Indication of De-Escalation Adjuvant Targeted Therapy for EGFR-Mutated NSCLC After Complete Resection.JTO Clin Res Rep. 2024 Nov 2;6(1):100758. doi: 10.1016/j.jtocrr.2024.100758. eCollection 2025 Jan. JTO Clin Res Rep. 2024. PMID: 39758595 Free PMC article.
-
Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors and Targeted Therapies in Early-Stage Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer: State-of-the-Art and Future Perspectives.Cancers (Basel). 2025 Feb 14;17(4):652. doi: 10.3390/cancers17040652. Cancers (Basel). 2025. PMID: 40002247 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Management of locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer: State of the art and future directions.Cancer Commun (Lond). 2024 Jan;44(1):23-46. doi: 10.1002/cac2.12505. Epub 2023 Nov 20. Cancer Commun (Lond). 2024. PMID: 37985191 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Integrated analysis of EGFR mutated non-small cell lung cancer reveals two distinct molecular subtypes.Clin Transl Med. 2023 Oct;13(10):e1431. doi: 10.1002/ctm2.1431. Clin Transl Med. 2023. PMID: 37830123 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Associated data
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials
Miscellaneous