A comparison among RIRS and MiniPerc for renal stones between 10 and 20 mm using thulium fiber laser (Fiber Dust): a randomized controlled trial
- PMID: 36029330
- DOI: 10.1007/s00345-022-04133-w
A comparison among RIRS and MiniPerc for renal stones between 10 and 20 mm using thulium fiber laser (Fiber Dust): a randomized controlled trial
Abstract
Purpose: We performed a prospective randomized comparison among Retrograde IntraRenal Surgery (RIRS) and MiniPerc (MP) for stones between 10 and 20 mm to evaluate outcomes with the same laser device: Fiber Dust.
Methods: Patients with a single renal stone between 10 and 20 mm were randomized to RIRS (Group A) versus MP (Group B). Exclusion criteria were age < 18 or > 75, presence of acute infection, coagulation impairments, cardiovascular or pulmonary comorbidities. In both groups, the Fiber Dust laser was used. A CT scan after 3 months was performed. A negative CT scan or asymptomatic patients with stone fragments < 3 mm and a negative urinary culture were the criteria to assess the stone-free status. A statistical analysis was carried out to assess success, complication and retreatment rates and need for auxiliary treatments.
Results: Between January 2021 and January 2022, 186 patients were enrolled (90 in Group A and 96 in Group B). Mean stone size was 15.8 mm and 14.9 mm in Group A and B, respectively (p = 0.23). The overall stone-free rate (SFR) was 73.3% for Group A and 84.4% for Group B. A higher SFR was reached for upper calyceal stones in Group A (90.4%) lower calyceal stones in Group B (91.6%). Retreatment rate (p = 0.31) and auxiliary procedure rate (p = 0.18) were comparable. Complication rate was 5.5% and 5.2% for Groups A and B, respectively.
Conclusions: RIRS and MP are both effective to obtain a postoperative SFR with Fiber Dust. According to the stone position one treatment is superior to the other one.
Keywords: Percutaneous nephrolithotomy; RIRS; Renal stone; Stone-free rate; Thulium fiber laser.
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.
References
-
- Skolarikos A, Neisius A, Petrik A, et al. (2022) EAU guidelines on urolithiasis. Edn. presented at the EAU Annual Congress Amsterdam, 2022. ISBN 978-94-92671-16-5.
-
- de la Rosette J, Denstedt J, Geavlete P et al (2014) The clinical research office of the endourological society ureteroscopy global study: indications, complications, and outcomes in 11,885 patients. J Endourol 28:131–139. https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2013.0436 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Karaolides T, Bach C, Kachrilas S et al (2013) Improving the durability of digital flexible ureteroscopes. Urology 81:717–722. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2013.01.016 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Mishra S, Sharma R, Garg C et al (2011) Prospective comparative study of miniperc and standard PNL for treatment of 1 to 2 cm size renal stone. BJU Int 108:896–899. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-410X.2010.09936.x (discussion 899-900) - DOI - PubMed
-
- Coskun A, Eryildirim B, Sarica K et al (2021) Comparison of mini percutaneous nephrolithotomy (Mini PCNL) and retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) for the minimal invasive management of lower caliceal stones. Urol J 18:485–490. https://doi.org/10.22037/uj.v18i07.6443 - DOI - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
