Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Oct;10(4):513-519.
doi: 10.1016/j.sxmr.2022.06.008. Epub 2022 Aug 25.

Systematic Review of Comparisons Between Plastic and Silicone Dilators: Revealing a Knowledge Gap

Orly Morgan  1 , Mariana Duenas Lopez  2 , Alberto J Caban Martinez  3 , Deborah C Marshall  4 , Julie B Schnur  2
Affiliations

Systematic Review of Comparisons Between Plastic and Silicone Dilators: Revealing a Knowledge Gap

Orly Morgan et al. Sex Med Rev. 2022 Oct.

Abstract

Introduction: Vaginal stenosis is a distressing side effect of radiation therapy that can impair quality of life. Dilator therapy is an option for patients undergoing pelvic radiotherapy to mitigate vaginal stenosis. Currently, the dilators given to patients by most hospitals are made of plastic, compared to silicone dilators which are available on the market for purchase.

Objectives: We conducted a systematic literature review to find information to guide clinical recommendations to pelvic radiotherapy patients on potential differences regarding the use of plastic vs silicone dilators with regard to efficacy, cost, and patient preferences.

Methods: A systematic literature review was conducted in Embase, MEDLINE, and PubMed using Emtree terms. To be included in the review, papers needed to: focus on female patients undergoing radiation therapy, assess a vaginal dilator, measure any dilator intervention outcome, and specifically compare plastic vs silicone dilators for any measured outcome (either qualitative or quantitative).

Results: The initial search yielded 195 articles. Two area experts, with a third expert for arbitration, read each article and found that none met all review inclusion criteria. No studies were found that compared silicone to plastic dilators with regard to efficacy in treating vaginal stenosis due to radiation therapy, no studies were found that compared cost or cost-effectiveness of the 2 dilator types, and no studies were found comparing patient preferences or experiences (eg, comfort, adherence, ease of use) between the 2 dilator types.

Conclusion: The materials used to create dilators have never been rigorously compared in the context of radiotherapy-related vaginal stenosis. Institutions and patients have no data to guide their choice. Significantly more research at the patient and institutional level is needed to explore the potential long-term quality of life and cost benefits of improved adherence with silicone dilator use, and to guide shared decision-making regarding dilator choice. Morgan O, Lopez MD, Martinez AJC, et al. Systematic Review of Comparisons Between Plastic and Silicone Dilators: Revealing a Knowledge Gap. Sex Med Rev 2022;10:513-519.

Keywords: Dyspareunia; Radiotherapy; Sexual Dysfunction; Vaginal Dilator.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest: The authors report no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Flow diagram of inclusion/exclusion criteria.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. National Cancer Institute, DCCPS, Surveillance Research Program Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) program populations (1969–2020) (www.seer.cancer.gov/popdata), released February 2022.
    1. Panjari M, Bell RJ, Burney S, et al. Sexual function, incontinence, and wellbeing in women after rectal cancer—A review of the evidence. J Sex Med 2012;9:2749–2758. - PubMed
    1. Zhou ES, Nekhlyudov L, Bober SL. The primary health carephysician and the cancer patient: Tips and strategies for managing sexual health. Transl Andriol Urol 2015;4:2018–2231. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Denton AS, Maher EJ. Interventions for the physical aspectsof sexual dysfunction in women following pelvic radiotherapy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2003;1. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Donovan KA, Taliaferro LA, Alvarez EM, et al. Sexual health inwomen treated for cervical cancer: Characteristics and correlates. Gynecol Oncol 2007;104:428–434. - PubMed

Publication types