Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2022;17(6):2615-2630.
doi: 10.1007/s11625-022-01204-0. Epub 2022 Aug 20.

Barriers to institutional social sustainability

Affiliations
Review

Barriers to institutional social sustainability

Walter Leal Filho et al. Sustain Sci. 2022.

Abstract

Social sustainability is a work field characterised by an emphasis on social aspects, e.g. equity, ethics, health, gender balance, or empowerment, within a broader sustainability context. Although the concept seems to be reasonably well established and deemed worthy of pursuing, some obstacles prevent its wide dissemination. Through a bibliometric analysis focusing on the literature on social sustainability at institutions, with a focus on companies, this paper aims to investigate and describe some of the barriers associated with social sustainability implementation. Apart from identifying that sustainability reporting, environmental disclosure and financial performance play a central role in successfully achieving social sustainability, in the context of which gender-related issues seem more tangential, the results indicated some solutions commonly reported for overcoming barriers and obstacles to a company's social sustainability implementation within different sectors. These solutions have to do, among many other factors addressed in this study, with strengthening communication transparency and trust, contributing to awareness, using technology to document and promote social sustainability. Thus, empowering organizations and citizens, recognized as essential factors to social development, and addressing the challenges in a multi-dimensional way.

Keywords: Challenges; Difficulties; Social dimension; Sustainable development.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Components and dynamics of corporate social sustainability and innovation. Source: Adapted from Ajmal et al. (2018) and Popa and Salanță (2015)
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Most commonly recognised categories intervening in social sustainability
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
The term co-occurrence analysis (including all studies related to social sustainability at companies)

References

    1. Ajmal MM, Khan M, Hussain M, Helo P. Conceptualizing and incorporating social sustainability in the business world. Int J Sustain Dev World. 2018;25:327–339. doi: 10.1080/13504509.2017.1408714. - DOI
    1. Al-Awadhi AM, Alsaifi K, Al-Awadhi A, Alhammadi S. Death and contagious infectious diseases: impact of the COVID-19 virus on stock market returns. J Behav Exp Finance. 2020;27:100326. doi: 10.1016/j.jbef.2020.100326. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Albareda L, Lozano JM, Tencati A, et al. The role of government in corporate social responsibility. In: Zsolnai L, Boda Z, Fekete L, et al., editors. Ethical Prospects. Netherlands, Dordrecht: Springer; 2009. pp. 103–149.
    1. Attaran M. The internet of things: limitless opportunities for business and society. J Strateg Innov Sustain. 2017;12:11.
    1. Awan U, Kraslawski A, Huiskonen J, Suleman N (2020) Exploring the locus of social sustainability implementation: a South Asian perspective on planning for sustainable development. In: Leal Filho W, Tortato UFF (eds) Universities and sustainable communities: meeting the goals of the agenda 2030. Springer International Publishing, Cham, pp 89–105

LinkOut - more resources