Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Editorial
. 2022 Jun;17(2):464-470.
doi: 10.26574/maedica.2022.17.2.464.

Nipah amidst Covid-19 Pandemic, another Re-Emerging Infectious Disease of Pandemic Potential - a Narrative Review

Affiliations
Editorial

Nipah amidst Covid-19 Pandemic, another Re-Emerging Infectious Disease of Pandemic Potential - a Narrative Review

Ariyanachi Kaliappan et al. Maedica (Bucur). 2022 Jun.

Abstract

Introduction: Nipah virus (NiV) was reported for the first time from the Kampung Sungai Nipah village of Malaysia in 1998. Since then, there have been multiple outbreaks, all of them in South- and South-East Asia. According to the World Health Organization (WHO), up to 75% of Nipah infections were proven to be fatal. Nipah virus belongs to the group of Biosafety Level-4 pathogen associated with high case fatality rate (40-75%). Methodology:According to the PRISMA guidelines for 2020, we searched in four medical databases (PubMed, Google Scholar, EMBASE and Scopus) and selected relevant studies from the past twenty years till November 2021. Review:Nipah virus was first detected in Malaysia's Kampung Sungai Nipah in 1998. By May 1999, the Malaysia Ministry of Health in association with the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) reported a total of 258 cases with a case fatality rate of almost 40%. Nipah in Kozhikode:Experts from the Pune Institute and Bhopal's National Institute of High Security Animal Diseases had collected Bat samples from Pazhoor in Chathamangalam gram panchayat (where a 12-year-old died due to Nipah infection on September 5 carried antibodies of the virus). All Indian outbreaks have seen person-to-person transmission. The virus found in Kerala differed from those two variants in terms of genetic structure. It also differed by 1.96% from the Bangladesh variant. The difference with the Malaysian variant was 8.42%. While PCR is the most sensitive technique for diagnosing active NiV infection, NiV-specific IgM ELISA offers a serological option when PCR is not available. Conclusions:Understanding the fruit bat ecology, NiV illness seasonality, and the transmission risk of various intermediate species requires a One Health approach. The danger of reintroduction into animal or human populations cannot be handled without a thorough understanding of the wildlife reservoir.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

FIGURE 1.
FIGURE 1.
Fruit bats in the genus Pteropus, family Pteropodidae, the main reservoir hosts of NiV
FIGURE 2.
FIGURE 2.
Nipah in Kozhikode: tests identify bats as source of the virus
FIGURE 3.
FIGURE 3.
Virus structure and pathogenesis

References

    1. Nikolay B, Salje H, Hossain MJ, et al. Transmission of Nipah Virus – 14 Years of Investigations in Bangladesh. N Engl J Med. 2019;380:1804–1814. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Clayton BA. Nipah virus: transmission of a zoonotic paramyxovirus. Curr Opin Virol. 2017;22:97–104. - PubMed
    1. Singh, Raj Kumar, et al. Nipah virus: epidemiology, pathology, immunobiology and advances in diagnosis, vaccine designing and control strategies – a comprehensive review. Veterinary Quarterly. 2019;39:26–55. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Brenda SP Ang, Tchoyoson CC Lim, Linfa Wang. Nipah Virus Infection. J Clin Microbiol. 2018;56:e01875–17. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Akanksha Rajput, Archit Kumar, Manoj Kumar. Computational Identification of Inhibitors Using QSAR Approach Against Nipah Virus. Front Pharmacol. 2019;10:71. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources