Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Aug 10:13:858291.
doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.858291. eCollection 2022.

Responses Toward Injustice Shaped by Justice Sensitivity - Evidence From Germany

Rebecca Bondü  1   2 , Anna K Holl  2   3 , Denny Trommler  2 , Manfred J Schmitt  4
Affiliations

Responses Toward Injustice Shaped by Justice Sensitivity - Evidence From Germany

Rebecca Bondü et al. Front Psychol. .

Abstract

Anger, indignation, guilt, rumination, victim compensation, and perpetrator punishment are considered primary responses associated with justice sensitivity (JS). However, injustice and high JS may predispose to further responses. We had N = 293 adults rate their JS, 17 potential responses toward 12 unjust scenarios from the victim's, observer's, beneficiary's, and perpetrator's perspectives, and several control variables. Unjust situations generally elicited many affective, cognitive, and behavioral responses. JS generally predisposed to strong affective responses toward injustice, including sadness, pity, disappointment, and helplessness. It impaired trivialization, victim-blaming, or justification, which may otherwise help cope with injustice. It predisposed to conflict solutions and victim compensation. Particularly victim and beneficiary JS had stronger effects in unjust situations from the corresponding perspective. These findings add to a better understanding of the main and interaction effects of unjust situations from different perspectives and the JS facets, differences between the JS facets, as well as the links between JS and behavior and well-being.

Keywords: anger; helplessness; justice sensitivity; sadness; social withdrawal.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Research design of the current study.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Averill J. R. (1983). Studies on anger and aggression: implications for theories of emotion. Am. Psychol. 38 1145–1160. 10.1037/0003-066X.38.11.1145 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bandura A., Barbaranelli C., Caprara G. V., Pastorelli C. (1996). Mechanisms of moral disengagement in the exercise of moral agency. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 71 364–374. 10.1037/0022-3514.71.2.364 - DOI
    1. Baumert A., Halmburger A., Schmitt M. (2013). Interventions against norm violations: dispositional determinants of self-reported and real moral courage. Pers. Soc. Psychol. Bull. 39, 1053–1068. - PubMed
    1. Baumert A., Otto K., Thomas N., Bobocel D. R., Schmitt M. (2012). Processing of unjust and just information: interpretation and memory performance related to dispositional victim sensitivity. Eur. J. Pers. 26 99–110. 10.1002/per.1844 - DOI
    1. Baumert A., Schlösser T., Schmitt M. (2014). Economic games. A performance-based assessment of fairness and altruism. Eur. J. Psychol. Assess. 30 178–192. 10.1027/1015-5759/a000183 - DOI

LinkOut - more resources