Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Aug;23(3):345-358.
doi: 10.1177/17511437211034701. Epub 2021 Jul 27.

Resilience in survivors of critical illness: A scoping review of the published literature in relation to definitions, prevalence, and relationship to clinical outcomes

Ellen Pauley  1 , Timothy S Walsh  1
Affiliations

Resilience in survivors of critical illness: A scoping review of the published literature in relation to definitions, prevalence, and relationship to clinical outcomes

Ellen Pauley et al. J Intensive Care Soc. 2022 Aug.

Abstract

Survivors of critical illness face substantial challenges in their recovery, including physical and cognitive dysfunction. Resilience is the ability to adapt and maintain one's mental health after facing such challenges. Higher resilience levels have been found to be beneficial throughout the illness trajectory in cancer patients, but resilience has not been widely researched in critical care patients. We undertook a scoping review to identify published studies on resilience following critical illness and describe: how resilience has been measured; the prevalence of low resilience in critical care patients; and what associations (if any) exist between resilience and clinical outcomes. We searched: PubMed, Medline, PsychINFO, CINAHL, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, to identify relevant studies. We found 882 unique titles: 17 were selected for full text review, 10 were considered relevant. These included ICU inpatients and survivors, and trauma and sepsis survivors. A broad critical appraisal of each study was undertaken. The overall quality of published studies was low: there was wide variation in resilience-assessment tools across the studies, including the timing of measurement; only one used a validated tool. Estimates of low resilience ranged from 28%-67%, but with varying populations, high risk of inclusion bias, and small samples. Higher resilience levels were significantly associated with lower depression, anxiety, post-traumatic stress, pain, anger, executive dysfunction, and difficulty with self-care in critical care patients and survivors. Future studies should use validated resilience assessment, determine the optimum timing, and explore prevalence, associations with outcomes, and resilience-promoting interventions in non-selected or clearly defined populations.

Keywords: Resilience; critical care; critical illness; intensive care units; psychological; survivorship.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declaration of conflicting interests: The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

References

    1. Lone NI, Gillies MA, Haddow C, et al.. Five year mortality and hospital costs associated with surviving intensive care. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2016; 194: 198–208. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Excellence NI for health and C. Rehabilitation after critical illness in adults. NICE guidance, www.nice.org.uk/guidance/qs158/resources/rehabilitation-after-critical-i... (2017, accessed 15 April 2019).
    1. Rawal G, Yadav S, Kumar R. Post-intensive care syndrome: an overview. J Transl Int Med 2017; 5: 90–92. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Lone NI, Seretny M, Wild SH, et al.. Surviving intensive care: a systematic review of healthcare resource use after hospital discharge*. Crit Care Med 41. - PubMed
    1. James Lind Alliance. The Priority Setting Partnerships (Online). Intensive Care Top 10.

Publication types