Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022;76(9):122.
doi: 10.1007/s00265-022-03224-3. Epub 2022 Aug 22.

From collocations to call-ocations: using linguistic methods to quantify animal call combinations

Affiliations

From collocations to call-ocations: using linguistic methods to quantify animal call combinations

Alexandra B Bosshard et al. Behav Ecol Sociobiol. 2022.

Abstract

Abstract: Emerging data in a range of non-human animal species have highlighted a latent ability to combine certain pre-existing calls together into larger structures. Currently, however, the quantification of context-specific call combinations has received less attention. This is problematic because animal calls can co-occur with one another simply through chance alone. One common approach applied in language sciences to identify recurrent word combinations is collocation analysis. Through comparing the co-occurrence of two words with how each word combines with other words within a corpus, collocation analysis can highlight above chance, two-word combinations. Here, we demonstrate how this approach can also be applied to non-human animal signal sequences by implementing it on artificially generated data sets of call combinations. We argue collocation analysis represents a promising tool for identifying non-random, communicatively relevant call combinations and, more generally, signal sequences, in animals.

Significance statement: Assessing the propensity for animals to combine calls provides important comparative insights into the complexity of animal vocal systems and the selective pressures such systems have been exposed to. Currently, however, the objective quantification of context-specific call combinations has received less attention. Here we introduce an approach commonly applied in corpus linguistics, namely collocation analysis, and show how this method can be put to use for identifying call combinations more systematically. Through implementing the same objective method, so-called call-ocations, we hope researchers will be able to make more meaningful comparisons regarding animal signal sequencing abilities both within and across systems.

Supplementary information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00265-022-03224-3.

Keywords: Call combinations; Collocation analysis; Comparative approach; Non-random structure; Syntax.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of interests / Competing interestsWe declare no conflict of interests.

References

    1. Altmann J. Observational study of behavior: sampling methods. Behaviour. 1974;49:227–266. - PubMed
    1. Arnold K, Zuberbühler K. Semantic combinations in primate calls. Nature. 2006;441:303. - PubMed
    1. Bartsch S. Structural and functional properties of collocations in English: a corpus study of lexical and pragmatic constraints on lexical co-occurrence. Tübingen: Gunter Narr Verlag; 2004.
    1. Berthet M, Mesbahi G, Pajot A, Cäsar C, Neumann C, Zuberbühler K. Titi monkeys combine alarm calls to create probabilistic meaning. Adv Sci. 2019;5:eaav3991. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Berwick RC, Okanoya K, Beckers GJ, Bolhuis JJ. Songs to syntax: the linguistics of birdsong. Trends Cogn Sci. 2011;15:113–121. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources