Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Aug 10:13:909948.
doi: 10.3389/fphar.2022.909948. eCollection 2022.

National trends in the use of oral chemotherapy over 13 years

Affiliations

National trends in the use of oral chemotherapy over 13 years

A Moreira et al. Front Pharmacol. .

Abstract

Background: Systemic cancer therapy has traditionally been administered using an intravenous (IV) route, implying patients' frequent visits to hospitals to access to their therapy. If we consider the actual pipeline in oncology, oral chemotherapy will be the main component of cancer treatment in the next few years. This shift in the administration route requires different care models in order to guarantee treatment efficacy and safety. Objective: To analyze time trends in oral chemotherapy consumption in Portugal. Method: Oral chemotherapy consumption over a 13-year period (2008-2020) was analyzed, considering dispensed units by the administration route with respective costs, resorting to the drug regulatory agency (INFARMED I.P.) database. Oral consumption patterns were further explored using common daily doses (CDD) for three conditions, including chronic myeloid leukemia (CML), non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), and breast cancer (BC), to adjust for the effect of varying doses. Data were analyzed descriptively resorting to Microsoft Office Excel 2010. Results: Overall chemotherapy consumption increased +Δ54.7%, with the highest contribution in units observed in oral forms (+Δ58.8%). The total expenditure increased +Δ96.5%, and despite the increase in oral forms (+Δ221.6%), intravenous forms continued to be the major cost driver, with an important contribution from immunotherapy. Much of the increase was led by the approval of 40 new IV and 48 new oral cancer medications with higher costs introduced in the market. Using CDD as an alternative metric to units had varying impacts by indication. The observed increases seemed to focus on specific cancer sites with varying effect; in CML, there was a 2.39-fold increase, compared to 4.41 for NSCLC and 1.86 for BC. However, for BC, two distinct sub-patterns were observed for hormone therapy (increasing 1.83) and for the novel tyrosine kinase inhibitors (increasing 40.8). Conclusion: The growing use of oral chemotherapy is obvious and calls for investments in supporting patients in managing medication adherence and adverse events. The shifts in the healthcare system are complex and need to be prioritized. Our data suggest that priority could be attributed to cancer sites driving innovation, namely, advanced breast cancer.

Keywords: common daily doses; consumption data; hospital oncology; medication adherence; oral chemotherapy; time trends.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Consumption trends of anticancer medication over a 13-year period, measured in units with respective costs. (A) +Δ54.7% represents the evolution of overall anticancer consumption units from 2008 to 2020 and +Δ96.5% represents the evolution of overall anticancer costs in euros from 2008 to 2020. (B) +Δ58.8% represents the evolution of oral anticancer consumption units from 2008 to 2020 and +Δ221.6% represents the evolution of oral anticancer costs in euros from 2008 to 2020. (C) −Δ3.33% represents the evolution of intravenous anticancer units from 2008 to 2020 and +Δ49.8% represents the evolution of intravenous anticancer consumption units from 2008 to 2020.
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
Overall consumption per pharmacotherapeutic group.
FIGURE 3
FIGURE 3
Consumption of oral medications used for NSCLC. (A) Comparison of consumption using CDD and units. (B) Comparison of consumption using CDD and units per drug.
FIGURE 4
FIGURE 4
Consumption trend using the CDD of oral anticancer for breast cancer, chronic myeloid leukemia, and non-small-cell lung cancer

References

    1. ACSS - Administração Central do Sistema de Saúde (2019). Relatório de Atividade 2018. Available at: http://www.acss.min-saude.pt/wp-content/uploads/2016/10/Relatorio-de-Ati... .
    1. Azim H. A., Awada A. (2012). Clinical development of new formulations of cytotoxics in solid tumors. Curr. Opin. Oncol. 24 (3), 325–331. 10.1097/CCO.0b013e328351fb29 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bosco-Lévy P., de Boissieu P., Gouverneur A., Noize P., Molimard M., Fourrier-Reglat A., et al. (2017). National trends in use and costs of oral anticancer drugs in France: An 8-year population-based study. Pharmacoepidemiol. Drug Saf. 26 (10), 1233–1241. 10.1002/pds.4282 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Cardoso Borges F., Alves da Costa F., Ramos A., Ramos C., Bernardo C., Brito C., et al. (2022). Real-world effectiveness of palbociclib plus fulvestrant in advanced breast cancer: Results from a population-based cohort study. Breast 62, 135–143. 10.1016/j.breast.2022.02.005 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Conti R. M., Fein A. J., Bhatta S. S. (2014). National trends in spending on and use of oral oncologics, first quarter 2006 through third quarter 2011. Health Aff. 33 (10), 1721–1727. 10.1377/hlthaff.2014.0001 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources