Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2022 Aug 12:16:970452.
doi: 10.3389/fnbeh.2022.970452. eCollection 2022.

Object recognition tasks in rats: Does sex matter?

Affiliations
Review

Object recognition tasks in rats: Does sex matter?

Marcela Becegato et al. Front Behav Neurosci. .

Abstract

Novelty recognition tasks based on object exploration are frequently used for the evaluation of cognitive abilities and investigation of neurobiological and molecular aspects of memory in rodents. This is an interesting approach because variations of the object recognition tasks focus on different aspects of the memory events such as novelty, location, context, and combinations of these elements. Nevertheless, as in most animal neuroscience research, female subjects are underrepresented in object recognition studies. When studies include females, the particularities of this sex are not always considered. For example, appropriate controls for manipulations conducted exclusively in females (such as estrous cycle verification) are not included. In addition, interpretation of data is often based on standardizations conducted with male subjects. Despite that, females are frequently reported as deficient and unable to adequately perform some memory tests. Thus, our study aims to review studies that describe similarities and differences between male and female performances in the different variations of object recognition tasks. In summary, although females are commonly described with deficits and the articles emphasize sex differences, most published data reveal similar performances when sexes are compared.

Keywords: behavioral task; cognition; ovariectomy; spatial memory; vaginal lavage.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Graphical flow diagram of the article selection process (n: number of articles in each phase).

References

    1. Abbott K. N., Morris M. J., Westbrook R. F., Reichelt A. C. (2016). Sex-specific effects of daily exposure to sucrose on spatial memory performance in male and female rats, and implications for estrous cycle stage. Physiol. Behav. 162 52–60. 10.1016/j.physbeh.2016.01.036 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Alteba S., Korem N., Akirav I. (2016). Cannabinoids reverse the effects of early stress on neurocognitive performance in adulthood. Learn. Mem. 23 349–358. 10.1101/lm.041608.116 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Anselmi M., Correa F. J., Santos J. R., Silva F., Cunha J. A., Henrique A., et al. (2016). Genetic evidence for chromosome 4 loci influencing learning and memory. Neurobiol. Learn. Mem. 131 182–191. 10.1016/j.nlm.2016.03.024 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Arbogast T., Razaz P., Ellegood J., Mckinstry S. U., Erdin S., Currall B., et al. (2019). Kctd13-deficient mice display short-term memory impairment and sex-dependent genetic interactions. Hum. Mol. Genet. 28 1474–1486. 10.1093/hmg/ddy436 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Arfa-Fatollahkhani P., Nahavandi A., Abtahi H., Anjidani S., Borhani S., Jameie S. B., et al. (2017). The effect of luteinizing hormone reducing agent on anxiety and novel object recognition memory in gonadectomized rats. Basic Clin. Neurosci. 8 113–120. 10.18869/nirp.bcn.8.2.113 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources