UNSUPERVISED CLUSTERING AND ANALYSIS OF CONTRACTION-DEPENDENT FETAL HEART RATE SEGMENTS
- PMID: 36035504
- PMCID: PMC9415917
- DOI: 10.1109/icassp43922.2022.9747598
UNSUPERVISED CLUSTERING AND ANALYSIS OF CONTRACTION-DEPENDENT FETAL HEART RATE SEGMENTS
Abstract
The computer-aided interpretation of fetal heart rate (FHR) and uterine contraction (UC) has not been developed well enough for wide use in delivery rooms. The main challenges still lie in the lack of unclear and nonstandard labels for cardiotocography (CTG) recordings, and the timely prediction of fetal state during monitoring. Rather than traditional supervised approaches to FHR classification, this paper demonstrates a way to understand the UC-dependent FHR responses in an unsupervised manner. In this work, we provide a complete method for FHR-UC segment clustering and analysis via the Gaussian process latent variable model, and density-based spatial clustering. We map the UC-dependent FHR segments into a space with a visual dimension and propose a trajectory-based FHR interpretation method. Three metrics of FHR trajectory are defined and an open-access CTG database is used for testing the proposed method.
Keywords: cardiotocography; trajectory of contraction-dependent fetal heart rate segments; unsupervised clustering.
Figures






Similar articles
-
eCTG: an automatic procedure to extract digital cardiotocographic signals from digital images.Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2018 Mar;156:133-139. doi: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2017.12.030. Epub 2018 Jan 2. Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2018. PMID: 29428065
-
CTG Analyzer: A graphical user interface for cardiotocography.Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2017 Jul;2017:2606-2609. doi: 10.1109/EMBC.2017.8037391. Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2017. PMID: 29060433
-
Developments in CTG analysis.Baillieres Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 1996 Jun;10(2):185-209. doi: 10.1016/s0950-3552(96)80033-2. Baillieres Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 1996. PMID: 8836480 Review.
-
Intrapartum cardiotocography trace pattern pre-processing, features extraction and fetal health condition diagnoses based on RCOG guideline.PeerJ Comput Sci. 2022 Aug 18;8:e1050. doi: 10.7717/peerj-cs.1050. eCollection 2022. PeerJ Comput Sci. 2022. PMID: 36092005 Free PMC article.
-
Computerised Cardiotocography Analysis for the Automated Detection of Fetal Compromise during Labour: A Review.Bioengineering (Basel). 2023 Aug 25;10(9):1007. doi: 10.3390/bioengineering10091007. Bioengineering (Basel). 2023. PMID: 37760109 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Approaches to Preventing Intrapartum Fetal Injury.Front Pediatr. 2022 Sep 23;10:915344. doi: 10.3389/fped.2022.915344. eCollection 2022. Front Pediatr. 2022. PMID: 36210941 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- Ayres-de Campos D, “Electronic fetal monitoring or cardiotocography, 50 years later: what’s in a name?” American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology, vol. 218, no. 6, pp. 545–546, 2018. - PubMed
-
- Sweha A, Hacker TW, and Nuovo J, “Interpretation of the electronic fetal heart rate during labor,” American family physician, vol. 59, no. 9, p. 2487, 1999. - PubMed
-
- Macones GA, Hankins GD, Spong CY, Hauth J, and Moore T, “The 2008 National Institute of Child Health and Human Development workshop report on electronic fetal monitoring: update on definitions, interpretation, and research guidelines,” Journal of Obstetric, Gynecologic, & Neonatal Nursing, vol. 37, no. 5, pp. 510–515, 2008. - PubMed
-
- Ayres-de Campos D, Spong CY, Chandraharan E, and Panel FIFMEC, “FIGO consensus guidelines on intrapartum fetal monitoring: Cardiotocography,” International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics, vol. 131, no. 1, pp. 13–24, 2015. - PubMed
-
- Hruban L, Spilka J, Chudáček V, Janků P, Huptych M, Burša M, Hudec A, Kacerovskỳ M, Kouckỳ M, Procházka M et al., “Agreement on intrapartum cardiotocogram recordings between expert obstetricians,” Journal of evaluation in clinical practice, vol. 21, no. 4, pp. 694–702, 2015. - PubMed
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources