Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2022 Aug 11:9:969060.
doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.969060. eCollection 2022.

Current recommendations for revascularization of non-infarct-related artery in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction and multivessel disease

Affiliations
Review

Current recommendations for revascularization of non-infarct-related artery in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction and multivessel disease

Korakoth Towashiraporn. Front Cardiovasc Med. .

Abstract

ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. Immediate reperfusion therapy of the infarct-related artery (IRA) is the mainstay of treatment, either via primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI) or thrombolytic therapy when PPCI is not feasible. Several studies have reported the incidence of multivessel disease (MVD) to be about 50% of total STEMI cases. This means that after successful PPCI of the IRA, residual lesion(s) of the non-IRA may persist. Unlike the atherosclerotic plaque of stable coronary artery disease, the residual obstructive lesion of the non-IRA contains a significantly higher prevalence of vulnerable plaques. Since these lesions are a strong predictor of acute coronary syndrome, if left untreated they are a possible cause of future adverse cardiovascular events. Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) of the obstructive lesion of the non-IRA to achieve complete revascularization (CR) is therefore preferable. Several major randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and meta-analyses demonstrated the clinical benefits of the CR strategy in the setting of STEMI with MVD, not only for enhancing survival but also for reducing unplanned revascularization. The CR strategy is now supported by recently published clinical practice guidelines. Nevertheless, the benefit of revascularization must be weighed against the risks from additional procedures.

Keywords: ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction; complete revascularization; infarct-related artery; multivessel disease; percutaneous coronary intervention.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The author declares that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
The summary of timing for complete revascularization and the method of guidance for PCI. COMPARE-ACUTE, Comparison Between FFR Guided Revascularization vs. Conventional Strategy in Acute STEMI Patients With MVD; COMPLETE, Complete vs. Culprit-Only Revascularization Strategies to Treat Multivessel Disease after Early PCI for STEMI; CULPRIT-SHOCK, Culprit Lesion Only PCI vs. Multivessel PCI in Cardiogenic Shock; CVLPRIT, Complete vs. Lesion-only Primary PCI; DANAMI3-PRIMULTI, Primary PCI in Patients With ST-elevation Myocardial Infarction and Multivessel Disease: Treatment of Culprit Lesion Only or Complete Revascularization; FFR, fractional flow reserve; FLOWER-MI, FLOW Evaluation to Guide Revascularization in Multi-vessel ST-elevation Myocardial Infarction IRA, infarct-related artery; PCI, percutaneous coronary intervention; PRAMI, Preventive Angioplasty in Acute Myocardial Infarction.
Figure 2
Figure 2
The practical approach for complete revascularization in patients with STEMI and MVD. CABG, coronary artery bypass graft; CS, cardiogenic shock; FFR; fractional flow reserve; IRA, infarct-related artery; MVD, multivessel disease; PCI, percutaneous coronary intervention; STEMI, ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Ibanez B, James S, Agewall S, Antunes MJ, Bucciarelli-Ducci C, Bueno H, et al. . 2017 ESC Guidelines for the management of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation: the task force for the management of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Eur Heart J. (2018) 39:119–77. 10.1093/eurheartj/ehx393 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Neumann FJ, Sousa-Uva M, Ahlsson A, Alfonso F, Banning AP, Benedetto U, et al. . 2018 ESC/EACTS Guidelines on myocardial revascularization. Eur Heart J. (2019) 40:87–165. 10.1093/eurheartj/ehy394 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Sorajja P, Gersh BJ, Cox DA, McLaughlin MG, Zimetbaum P, Costantini C, et al. . Impact of multivessel disease on reperfusion success and clinical outcomes in patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention for acute myocardial infarction. Eur Heart J. (2007) 28:1709–16. 10.1093/eurheartj/ehm184 - DOI - PubMed
    1. de Waha S, Eitel I, Desch S, Fuernau G, Poss J, Schuler G, et al. . Impact of multivessel coronary artery disease on reperfusion success in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction: A substudy of the AIDA STEMI trial. Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care. (2017) 6:592–600. 10.1177/2048872615624240 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Muller DW, Topol EJ, Ellis SG, Sigmon KN, Lee K, Califf RM. Multivessel coronary artery disease: a key predictor of short-term prognosis after reperfusion therapy for acute myocardial infarction. Thrombolysis and angioplasty in myocardial infarction (TAMI) study group. Am Heart J. (1991) 121:1042–9. - PubMed