Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2022 Aug 12:9:950018.
doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.950018. eCollection 2022.

Progress in murine models of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm

Affiliations
Review

Progress in murine models of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm

Li Yin et al. Front Cardiovasc Med. .

Abstract

Abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) is a focal dilation of the aorta that is prevalent in aged populations. The progressive and unpredictable expansion of AAA could result in aneurysmal rupture, which is associated with ~80% mortality. Due to the expanded screening efforts and progress in diagnostic tools, an ever-increasing amount of asymptomatic AAA patients are being identified yet without a cure to stop the rampant aortic expansion. A key barrier that hinders the development of effective AAA treatment is our incomplete understanding of the cellular and molecular basis of its pathogenesis and progression into rupture. Animal models provide invaluable mechanistic insights into AAA pathophysiology. However, there is no single experimental model that completely recapitulate the complex biology behind AAA, and different AAA-inducing methodologies are associated with distinct disease course and rupture rate. In this review article, we summarize the established murine models of ruptured AAA and discuss their respective strengths and utilities.

Keywords: AngII; abdominal aortic aneurysm; elastase; mouse model; rupture aneurysm.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
The morphological and histological features in clinical vs. experimental models of rAAA (created with BioRender.com).

References

    1. Lindholt JS, Juul S, Fasting H, Henneberg EW. Screening for abdominal aortic aneurysms: single centre randomised controlled trial. BMJ. (2005) 330:750. 10.1136/bmj.38369.620162.82 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kent KC, Zwolak RM, Egorova NN, Riles TS, Manganaro A, Moskowitz AJ, et al. . Analysis of risk factors for abdominal aortic aneurysm in a cohort of more than 3 million individuals. J Vasc Surg. (2010) 52:539k RM 10.1016/j.jvs.2010.05.090 - DOI - PubMed
    1. van Vlijmen-van Keulen CJ, Pals G, Rauwerda JA. Familial abdominal aortic aneurysm: a systematic review of a genetic background. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. (2002) 24:105–16. 10.1053/ejvs.2002.1692 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Wanhainen A, Verzini F, Van Herzeele I, Allaire E, Bown M, Cohnert T, et al. . Editor's choice - european society for vascular surgery (ESVS) 2019 clinical practice guidelines on the management of abdominal aorto-iliac artery aneurysms. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. (2019) 57:8ndov 10.1016/j.ejvs.2018.09.020 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Sampson UK, Norman PE, Fowkes FG, Aboyans V, Song Y, Harrell FE, Jr, et al. . Estimation of global and regional incidence and prevalence of abdominal aortic aneurysms 1990 to 2010. Glob Heart. (2014) 9:159–70. 10.1016/j.gheart.2013.12.009 - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources