A public health approach to monitoring HIV with resistance to HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis
- PMID: 36037154
- PMCID: PMC9423671
- DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0272958
A public health approach to monitoring HIV with resistance to HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis
Abstract
Background: The risk of HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) failure with sufficient medication adherence is extremely low but has occurred due to transmission of a viral strain with mutations conferring resistance to PrEP components tenofovir (TDF) and emtricitabine (FTC). The extent to which such strains are circulating in the population is unknown.
Methods: We used HIV surveillance data to describe primary and overall TDF/FTC resistance and concurrent viremia among people living with HIV (PLWH). HIV genotypes conducted for clinical purposes are reported as part of HIV surveillance. We examined the prevalence of HIV strains with mutations conferring intermediate to high level resistance to TDF/FTC, defining primary resistance (predominantly K65R and M184I/V mutations) among sequences reported within 3 months of HIV diagnosis and total resistance for sequences reported at any time. We examined trends in primary resistance during 2010-2019 and total resistance among all PLWH in 2019. We also monitored resistance with viremia (≥1,000 copies/mL) at the end of 2019 among PLWH.
Results: Between 2010 and 2019, 2,172 King County residents were diagnosed with HIV; 1,557 (72%) had a genotypic resistance test within three months; three (0.2%) had primary TDF/FTC resistance with both K65R and M184I/V mutations. Adding isolated resistance for each drug resulted in 0.3% with primary TDF resistance and 0.8% with primary FTC resistance. Of 7,056 PLWH in 2019, 4,032 (57%) had genotype results, 241 (6%) had TDF/FTC resistance and 15 (0.4% of those with a genotype result) had viremia and TDF/FTC resistance.
Conclusions: Primary resistance and viremia combined with TDF/FTC resistance are uncommon in King County. Monitoring trends in TDF/FTC resistance coupled with interventions to help ensure PLWH achieve and maintain viral suppression may help ensure that PrEP failure remains rare.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
References
-
- Baeten JM, Donnell D, Mugo NR, Ndase P, Thomas KK, Campbell JD, et al.. Single-agent tenofovir versus combination emtricitabine plus tenofovir for preexposure prophylaxis for HIV-1 acquisition: an update of data from a randomised, doubleblind, phase 3 trial. Lancet Infect Dis 2014;14:1055–1064. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(14)70937-5 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- McCormack S, Dunn DT, Desai M, Dolling DI, Gafos M, Gilson R, et al.. Pre-exposure prophylaxis to prevent the acquisition of HIV-1 infection (PROUD): effectiveness results from the pilot phase of a pragmatic open-label randomised trial. Lancet 2016. 2;387:53–60. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)00056-2 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous
