DEGRO practical guideline for central nervous system radiation necrosis part 1: classification and a multistep approach for diagnosis
- PMID: 36038669
- PMCID: PMC9515024
- DOI: 10.1007/s00066-022-01994-3
DEGRO practical guideline for central nervous system radiation necrosis part 1: classification and a multistep approach for diagnosis
Abstract
Purpose: The Working Group for Neuro-Oncology of the German Society for Radiation Oncology in cooperation with members of the Neuro-Oncology Working Group of the German Cancer Society aimed to define a practical guideline for the diagnosis and treatment of radiation-induced necrosis (RN) of the central nervous system (CNS).
Methods: Panel members of the DEGRO working group invited experts, participated in a series of conferences, supplemented their clinical experience, performed a literature review, and formulated recommendations for medical treatment of RN including bevacizumab in clinical routine.
Conclusion: Diagnosis and treatment of RN requires multidisciplinary structures of care and defined processes. Diagnosis has to be made on an interdisciplinary level with the joint knowledge of a neuroradiologist, radiation oncologist, neurosurgeon, neuropathologist, and neuro-oncologist. A multistep approach as an opportunity to review as many characteristics as possible to improve diagnostic confidence is recommended. Additional information about radiotherapy (RT) techniques is crucial for the diagnosis of RN. Misdiagnosis of untreated and progressive RN can lead to severe neurological deficits. In this practice guideline, we propose a detailed nomenclature of treatment-related changes and a multistep approach for their diagnosis.
Keywords: Bevacizumab; Brain metastases; Glioma; Radioation necrosis; Reirradiation.
© 2022. The Author(s).
Conflict of interest statement
D. Bernhardt, L. König, A. Grosu, B. Wiestler, S. Rieken, W. Wick, J. Gempt, S.M. Krieg, F. Schmidt-Graf, F. Sahm, B. Meyer, B.J. Krause, C. Petersen, R. Fietkau, M. Thomas, F. Giordano, A. Wittig-Sauerwein, J. Debus, G. Tabatabai, P. Hau, J. Steinbach, and S.E. Combs declare that they have no competing interests. L. König reports grants from Ruprecht-Karls Universität Heidelberg, personal fees from Accuray Inc., and Novocure GmbH outside the submitted work. D. Bernhardt reports personal fees and honoraria from Accuray Inc., AstraZeneca, and Novocure GmbH outside the submitted work. D. Bernhardt’s spouse is employed at Gilead Science. M. Thomas reports personal fees, honoraria for advisory boards, and research funding from AstraZeneca, Beigene, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Boehringer Ingelheim, Celgene, Chugai, Daiichi Sankyo, GlaxoSmithKline, Janssen Oncology, Lilly, Merck, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Sanofi, Takeda. F. Giordano reports research grants, honoraria, and travel expenses from Carl Zeiss Meditec AG and NOXXON Pharma AG, personal fees from MVZ Venusberg GmbH, and consulting/speaker honoraria from Bristol Myers Squibb, Medac GmbH, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Elsevier, AstraZeneca, and Guerbet SA. S.M. Krieg is consultant for Brainlab AG (Munich, Germany) and Ulrich Medical (Ulm, Germany). S.M. Krieg received honoraria from Nexstim Plc (Helsinki, Finland), Spineart Deutschland GmbH (Frankfurt, Germany), Medtronic (Meerbusch, Germany), and Carl Zeiss Meditec (Oberkochen, Germany). J. Debus: institution received research grants from Merck Serono, institution received consultation honoraria from Merck serono, J. Debus received travel reimbursement from Merck Serono, institution received research grants from Siemens Healthineers and Accuray.
Figures
References
-
- Combs SE, et al. Randomized phase II study evaluating a carbon ion boost applied after combined radiochemotherapy with temozolomide versus a proton boost after radiochemotherapy with temozolomide in patients with primary glioblastoma: The CLEOPATRA Trial. BMC Cancer. 2010 doi: 10.1186/1471-2407-10-478. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
