Comprehension, utility, and preferences of prostate cancer survivors for visual timelines of patient-reported outcomes co-designed for limited graph literacy: meters and emojis over comics
- PMID: 36040190
- PMCID: PMC9552288
- DOI: 10.1093/jamia/ocac148
Comprehension, utility, and preferences of prostate cancer survivors for visual timelines of patient-reported outcomes co-designed for limited graph literacy: meters and emojis over comics
Abstract
Objective: Visual timelines of patient-reported outcomes (PRO) can help prostate cancer survivors manage longitudinal data, compare with population averages, and consider future trajectories. PRO visualizations are most effective when designed with deliberate consideration of users. Yet, graph literacy is often overlooked as a design constraint, particularly when users with limited graph literacy are not engaged in their development. We conducted user testing to assess comprehension, utility, and preference of longitudinal PRO visualizations designed for prostate cancer survivors with limited literacy.
Materials and methods: Building upon our prior work co-designing longitudinal PRO visualizations with survivors, we engaged 18 prostate cancer survivors in a user study to assess 4 prototypes: Meter, Words, Comic, and Emoji. During remote sessions, we collected data on prototype comprehension (gist and verbatim), utility, and preference.
Results: Participants were aged 61-77 (M = 69), of whom half were African American. The majority of participants had less than a college degree (95%), had inadequate health literacy (78%), and low graph literacy (89%). Among the 4 prototypes, Meter had the best gist comprehension and was preferred. Emoji was also preferred, had the highest verbatim comprehension, and highest rated utility, including helpfulness, confidence, and satisfaction. Meter and Words both rated mid-range for utility, and Words scored lower than Emoji and Meter for comprehension. Comic had the poorest comprehension, lowest utility, and was least preferred.
Discussion: Findings identify design considerations for PRO visualizations, contributing to the knowledge base for visualization best practices. We describe our process to meaningfully engage patients from diverse and hard-to-reach groups for remote user testing, an important endeavor for health equity in biomedical informatics.
Conclusion: Graph literacy is an important design consideration for PRO visualizations. Biomedical informatics researchers should be intentional in understanding user needs by involving diverse and representative individuals during development.
Keywords: consumer health information; health education; health literacy; patient-reported outcome measure; user-centered design.
© The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Medical Informatics Association. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.
Figures


Similar articles
-
Patient preferences for visualization of longitudinal patient-reported outcomes data.J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2020 Feb 1;27(2):212-224. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocz189. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2020. PMID: 31670816 Free PMC article.
-
The effectiveness of health literacy interventions on the informed consent process of health care users: a systematic review protocol.JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Oct;13(10):82-94. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-2304. JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015. PMID: 26571285
-
Visual analogies, not graphs, increase patients' comprehension of changes in their health status.J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2020 May 1;27(5):677-689. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocz217. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2020. PMID: 31999316 Free PMC article.
-
Evaluation of quality, readability, suitability, and usefulness of online resources available to cancer survivors.J Cancer Surviv. 2023 Apr;17(2):544-555. doi: 10.1007/s11764-022-01318-5. Epub 2023 Jan 10. J Cancer Surviv. 2023. PMID: 36626094 Review.
-
Health literacy, numeracy, graph literacy, and digital literacy: an overview of definitions, evaluation methods, and best practices.Eur J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2024 May 28;23(4):423-428. doi: 10.1093/eurjcn/zvad085. Eur J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2024. PMID: 37590968 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Codesign of health technology interventions to support best-practice perioperative care and surgical waitlist management.BMJ Health Care Inform. 2024 Mar 12;31(1):e100928. doi: 10.1136/bmjhci-2023-100928. BMJ Health Care Inform. 2024. PMID: 38471784 Free PMC article.
-
Meeting the information and communication needs of health disparate populations.J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2022 Oct 7;29(11):1827-1828. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocac164. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2022. PMID: 36217862 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
A RE-AIM Evaluation of a Visualization-Based Electronic Patient-Reported Outcome System.Appl Clin Inform. 2023 Mar;14(2):227-237. doi: 10.1055/a-2008-4036. Epub 2023 Jan 5. Appl Clin Inform. 2023. PMID: 36603838 Free PMC article.
-
Tailored Self-Management App to Support Older Adults With Cancer and Multimorbidity: Development and Usability Testing.JMIR Aging. 2024 May 8;7:e53163. doi: 10.2196/53163. JMIR Aging. 2024. PMID: 38717806 Free PMC article.
-
Community engagement in the development of health-related data visualizations: a scoping review.J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2024 Jan 18;31(2):479-487. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocad090. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2024. PMID: 37279890 Free PMC article.
References
-
- National Cancer Institute: Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program. Prostate Cancer—Cancer Stat Facts. https://seer.cancer.gov/statfacts/html/prost.html Accessed April 30, 2022.
-
- Ávila M, Patel L, López S, et al.Patient-reported outcomes after treatment for clinically localized prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Cancer Treat Rev 2018; 66: 23–44. - PubMed