Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Oct:310:115308.
doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2022.115308. Epub 2022 Aug 25.

Determinants of voluntary compliance: COVID-19 mitigation

Affiliations

Determinants of voluntary compliance: COVID-19 mitigation

Meng-Hao Li et al. Soc Sci Med. 2022 Oct.

Abstract

During the pre-vaccine period, the success of containing the spread of COVID-19 depends upon how communities respond to non-pharmaceutical mitigation policies such as social distancing, wearing of masks, retail and dining constraints, crowd limitation, and shelter-in-place orders. Of these policies, shelter-in-place and social distancing are of central importance. By using county-level mobility data as a measure of a community's voluntary compliance with social distancing policies, this study found that counties who received strong state social distancing policy directives and who had a high pro-social character showed lower mobility on retail and recreation mobility and grocery and pharmacy mobility (better social distancing) after states reopened from shelter-in-place orders. Counties that experienced a longer duration of shelter-in-place orders showed higher mobility (less social distancing), implying that the duration of the shelter-in-place order deteriorated social distancing response after reopening. This may be because reopening sent a "safe" signal to these counties or resulted in a response to the pent-up demand inducing higher mobility. The results indicate that implementing shelter-in-place and social distancing policies to slow down the transmission of COVID-19 were not necessarily effective in motivating a county to reduce mobility voluntarily. A county's pro-social character and the duration of shelter-in-place order should be considered when designing COVID-19 mitigation policies.

Keywords: COVID-19; Mitigation; Pro-social characteristics; Shelter-in-Place; Social distancing.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declaration of competing interest None.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
3 Weeks Average of Retail & Recreation Mobility after State Reopening.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
3 Weeks Average of Grocery & Pharmacy Mobility after State Reopening.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Number of Social Distancing Policies by State.
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Pro-social Character Index by County.
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Periods of the Shelter-in-Place Order by State.
Fig. 6
Fig. 6
Percentage of Nonprofit Organization by County.
Fig. 7
Fig. 7
Interaction effect between social distancing policies and pro-social character index on retail and recreation mobility.
Fig. 8
Fig. 8
Interaction effect between social distancing policies and pro-social character index on grocery and pharmacy mobility.

References

    1. Aktay A., Bavadekar S., Cossoul G., Davis J., Desfontaines D., Fabrikant A., et al. 2020. Google COVID-19 Community Mobility Reports: Anonymization Process Description.https://arxiv.org/abs/2004.04145
    1. Arbesman S., Christakis N.A. Scaling of prosocial behavior in cities. Phys. Stat. Mech. Appl. 2011;390(11):2155–2159. doi: 10.1016/j.physa.2011.02.013. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bai J.J., Du S., Jin W., Wan C. Social Science Research Network; 2020. The Impact of social Capital on individual Responses to COVID-19 pandemic: Evidence from social distancing (SSRN scholarly paper ID 3609001) - DOI
    1. Barrios J.M., Benmelech E., Hochberg Y.V., Sapienza P., Zingales L. Civic capital and social distancing during the Covid-19 pandemic. J. Publ. Econ. 2021;193 doi: 10.1016/j.jpubeco.2020.104310. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Baumsteiger R. What the world needs now: an intervention for promoting prosocial behavior. Basic Appl. Soc. Psychol. 2019;41(4):215–229. doi: 10.1080/01973533.2019.1639507. - DOI

Publication types