Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Dec:95:102147.
doi: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2022.102147. Epub 2022 Aug 13.

Lessons learned for public health workforce development: An evaluation of the centers for disease control and prevention's laboratory leadership service fellowship

Caitlin McColloch  1 , Meagan Davis  2 , Aufra Araujo  2 , Shaniece Theodore  2 , Joi Barkley  2 , Margaret Paek  3 , Tara Henning  2
Affiliations

Lessons learned for public health workforce development: An evaluation of the centers for disease control and prevention's laboratory leadership service fellowship

Caitlin McColloch et al. Eval Program Plann. 2022 Dec.

Abstract

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention launched the Laboratory Leadership Service (LLS) Fellowship Program in July 2015 to develop public health laboratory (PHL) leaders who will improve PHL quality and safety. This article describes a retrospective, summative evaluation to determine the extent to which LLS has met its short-term goals for PHL workforce development. The evaluation relied on existing data from routine LLS data collection and reporting, supplemented with a new alumni survey. The purpose of the design was threefold: 1) to reduce data collection burden on program staff and participants, 2) to assess the value and limits of routine fellowship data for comprehensive public health workforce development program evaluation, and 3) to identify ways to improve LLS's routine data collections for program evaluation. We used descriptive statistics, qualitative analysis, and participatory methods (i.e., a data party) to analyze and interpret data. Results show LLS short-term outcome achievement and highlight opportunities for program improvement, particularly related to the design of certain training requirements and for future evaluations. Overall, the evaluation contributes to lessons learned for PHL workforce development efforts, including how routine data collections can contribute to comprehensive public health workforce development evaluations.

Keywords: Program evaluation; Public health laboratory; Public health workforce; Training evaluation; Workforce development.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declaration of Interests The authors declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, or publication of this article.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Laboratory Leadership Service (LLS) Fellowship Program key activities
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Laboratory Leadership Service (LLS) Fellowship Program Simplified Logic Model
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Association of Public Health Laboratories. (2014). Linking Environmental Laboratory Science with Epidemiologic Investigations: A Systems Approach, https://www.aphl.org/aboutAPHL/publications/Documents/EH_LinkingEnvironm....
    1. Baker EL, Potter MA, Jones DL, Mercer SL, Cioffi JP, Green LW, Halverson PK, Lichtveld MY, & Fleming DW (2005). The public health infrastructure and our nation’s health. Annu Rev Public Health, 26, 303–318. - PubMed
    1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (1999). Framework for program evaluation in public health. MMWR, 48, 40.
    1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2014). Report on the potential exposure to anthrax. www.cdc.gov/labs/pdf/Final_Anthrax_Report.pdf.
    1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2018). Data Collection Methods for Evaluation: Document Review. Evaluation Brief, 18. https://www.cdc.gov/healthyyouth/evaluation/pdf/brief18.pdf.

LinkOut - more resources