Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 May 26;3(1):14-20.
doi: 10.1007/s42761-021-00050-0. eCollection 2022 Mar.

Systemic Racism in EEG Research: Considerations and Potential Solutions

Tricia Choy  1 , Elizabeth Baker  1 , Katherine Stavropoulos  1
Affiliations

Systemic Racism in EEG Research: Considerations and Potential Solutions

Tricia Choy et al. Affect Sci. .

Abstract

The current theoretical paper discusses the unintended systemic racism and racial biases that impact neuroscience, specifically in research utilizing electroencephalography (EEG). As a popular technique in affective science research, EEG requires adherence between the electrode and scalp to measure brain activity. To obtain high-quality data, various factors such as hair length, hair type, body movement, and/or extraneous noise from the environment are taken into consideration. As EEG researchers attempt to gather good-quality data, the recruitment and retention of Black American participants is challenging due to hairstyles commonly worn by Black American participants (e.g., cornrows, braids) and hair type. Taken together, the systemic lack of data from Black American participants renders research findings less generalizable and causes disparities in theoretical knowledge applicable to this population. To address this disparity, innovative solutions invented by bioengineers are discussed.

Keywords: EEG; Minority samples; Neuroscience; Systemic racism.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of InterestThe authors declare no competing interests.

References

    1. Burle B, Spieser L, Roger C, Casini L, Hasbroucq T, Vidal F. Spatial and temporal resolutions of EEG: Is it really black and white? A scalp current density view. On the benefits of using surface Laplacian (current source density) methodology in electrophysiology. 2015;97(3):210–220. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2015.05.004. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Casson AJ. Wearable EEG and beyond. Biomedical Engineering Letters. 2019;9(1):53–71. doi: 10.1007/s13534-018-00093-6. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Chi YM, Jung T-P, Cauwenberghs G. Dry-contact and noncontact biopotential electrodes: Methodological review. IEEE Reviews in Biomedical Engineering. 2010;3:106–119. doi: 10.1109/RBME.2010.2084078. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Cuffin BN. Effects of local variations in skull and scalp thickness on EEG’s and MEG’s. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering. 1993;40(1):42–48. doi: 10.1109/10.204770. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Etienne A, Laroia T, Weigle H, Afelin A, Kelly SK, Krishnan A, Grover P. Novel electrodes for reliable EEG recordings on coarse and curly hair. BioRxiv. 2020;2020(02):26.965202. doi: 10.1101/2020.02.26.965202. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources