Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Nov 24;2(4):414-426.
doi: 10.1007/s42761-021-00081-7. eCollection 2021 Dec.

The Rocky Road from Experience to Expression of Emotions-Women's Anger About Sexism

Affiliations

The Rocky Road from Experience to Expression of Emotions-Women's Anger About Sexism

Julia Sasse et al. Affect Sci. .

Abstract

We investigated women's anger expression in response to sexism. In three studies (Ns = 103, 317, and 241), we tested the predictions that women express less anger about sexism than they experience-the anger gap-and that the anger expressed by women is associated with instrumental concerns, specifically perceived costs and benefits of confronting sexism. To estimate the specificity of the proposed gap, we compared women's anger reactions to men's anger reactions as well as anger reactions to sadness reactions. Across studies, we found support for the anger gap, that is, lower anger expression than experience, and the gap was more pronounced for women than for men (Study 3). Surprisingly, a gap also occurred in sadness reactions. Regarding instrumental concerns, there was converging evidence that expressed anger was negatively associated with individual costs. We also investigated whether anger expression can be encouraged through women's identification with feminists (Studies 1 and 2) and support by other women (Study 2); yet, we found no evidence. We conclude that, to understand women's-and men's-reactions to sexism, it is critical not to mistake their emotion expression for how they really feel, but instead to also consider strategic concerns.

Supplementary information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s42761-021-00081-7.

Keywords: Anger; Emotion expression; Feminism; Identification; Sexism.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of InterestThe authors have no relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Anger gap for women and men in Study 3. Error bars indicate 95% CI

References

    1. Brody LR, Hall JA. Gender, emotion, and socialization. In: Chrisler JC, McCreary DR, editors. Handbook of gender research in psychology. New York: Springer; 2010. pp. 429–454.
    1. de Vos B, van Zomeren M, Gordijn EH, Postmes T. The communication of “pure” group-based anger reduces tendencies toward intergroup conflict because it increases out-group empathy. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. 2013;39:1043–1052. doi: 10.1177/0146167213489140. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Eagly AH, Wood W. Social role theory of sex differences. In: Wong A, Wickramasinghe M, Hoogland R, Naples NA, editors. The Wiley Blackwell encyclopedia of gender and sexuality studies. John Wiley & Sons Ltd; 2016. pp. 1–3.
    1. Ellsworth PC, Scherer KR. Appraisal processes in emotion. In: Davidson RJ, Scherer KR, Goldsmith HH, editors. Handbook of affective sciences. Oxford University Press; 2003. pp. 572–595.
    1. Evers C, Fischer AH, Manstead ASR. Gender and emotion regulation: A social appraisal perspective on anger. In: Nyklíček I, Vingerhoets A, Zeelenberg M, editors. Emotion regulation and well-being. Springer; 2011. pp. 211–222.

LinkOut - more resources