The outcomes of ultrafiltration in on-pump versus off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting in patients with renal impairment
- PMID: 36045425
- PMCID: PMC9429667
- DOI: 10.1186/s13019-022-01976-7
The outcomes of ultrafiltration in on-pump versus off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting in patients with renal impairment
Abstract
Objective: In chronic kidney disease (CKD), using cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) may contribute to renal dysfunction. Off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (OPCAB) is one technique that preserved renal function, but the procedure may not be possible in certain situations. The ultrafiltration (UF) can remove excess fluid and inflammatory mediators that result from exposure to the CPB. Coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) with UF could be an alternative way to preserve renal function.
Method: A retrospective study of CKD patients who underwent CABG. The renal outcomes were compared between the patients who underwent CABG with UF and OPCAB. A repeated measure adjusted by propensity score was used for comparing the renal outcome. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression was used to identify the risk factors for acute renal failure (AKI) and adverse outcomes.
Results: From January 2009 and June 2020, there were 220 CKD patients, 109 (49.55%) patients underwent CABG with UF, and 111 (50.45%) patients underwent OPCAB. There were statistically significant differences in the change of the average level of creatinine between CABG with UF (increased + 0.09 mg/dl) and OPCAB (decreased - 0.05 mg/dl) (p = 0.043). Also, patients who underwent CABG with UF had a significantly increased risk for AKI (OR 5.38, 95%CI 1.09, 26.5).
Conclusion: The UF adjunct technique in CABG with CPB tends to provide a lower protective effect for renal function and had a significantly higher incidence of post-cardiac surgery AKI when compared to OPCAB. If technically feasible, OPCAB would be a preferable choice for CKD patients.
Study registration number: SUR-2562-06607/Research ID: 6607.
Keywords: CABG; Cardiopulmonary bypass; OPCAB; Ultrafiltration.
© 2022. The Author(s).
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Figures


Similar articles
-
Beating-heart coronary artery bypass grafting with miniaturized cardiopulmonary bypass results in a more complete revascularization when compared to off-pump grafting.Artif Organs. 2010 Mar;34(3):179-84. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1594.2009.00836.x. Artif Organs. 2010. PMID: 20447041
-
Current Status of Off-pump Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting in Patients with Multiple Coronary Artery Disease Compared with On-pump Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting: The Korean National Cohort Study.Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2018 Sep;66(6):470-476. doi: 10.1055/s-0038-1651516. Epub 2018 May 31. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2018. PMID: 29852507
-
Risk factors and clinical significance of acute kidney injury after on-pump or off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting: a propensity score-matched study.Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2019 Jun 1;28(6):893-899. doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivy353. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2019. PMID: 30649484
-
Off-pump versus on-pump coronary surgery in patients with chronic kidney disease: a meta-analysis.Clin Exp Nephrol. 2018 Feb;22(1):99-109. doi: 10.1007/s10157-017-1432-7. Epub 2017 Jun 20. Clin Exp Nephrol. 2018. PMID: 28634771 Review.
-
Off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting improves short-term outcomes in high-risk patients compared with on-pump coronary artery bypass grafting: Meta-analysis.J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2016 Jan;151(1):60-77.e1-58. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2015.08.042. Epub 2015 Aug 15. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2016. PMID: 26433633 Review.
Cited by
-
Off-pump vs. on-pump coronary artery bypass grafting in patients with chronic kidney disease: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis.Int Urol Nephrol. 2025 Feb;57(2):463-477. doi: 10.1007/s11255-024-04198-z. Epub 2024 Sep 9. Int Urol Nephrol. 2025. PMID: 39249666
-
Adverse renal effects associated with cardiopulmonary bypass.Perfusion. 2024 Apr;39(3):452-468. doi: 10.1177/02676591231157055. Epub 2023 Feb 16. Perfusion. 2024. PMID: 36794518 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Comparative Effectiveness of On-Pump Versus Off-Pump Coronary Surgical Revascularization Related to Postoperative Acute Kidney Injury.Am J Cardiol. 2025 Mar 1;238:9-11. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2024.11.016. Epub 2024 Nov 23. Am J Cardiol. 2025. PMID: 39581520 No abstract available.
-
Effect of on-pump vs. off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting in patients with non-dialysis-dependent severe renal impairment: propensity-matched analysis from the UK registry dataset.Front Cardiovasc Med. 2024 Feb 13;11:1341123. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2024.1341123. eCollection 2024. Front Cardiovasc Med. 2024. PMID: 38414924 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Matata B, Mediratta N, Morgan M, Shirley S, Scawn N, Kemp I, et al. The impact of continuous haemofiltration with high-volume fluid exchange during cardiopulmonary bypass surgery on the recovery of patients with impaired renal function: a pilot randomised trial. Health Technol Assess. 2013;17(49):i–xiv. doi: 10.3310/hta17490. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- Asimakopoulos G, Karagounis AP, Valencia O, Alexander N, Howlader M, Sarsam MA, et al. Renal function after cardiac surgery off- versus on-pump coronary artery bypass: analysis using the Cockroft-Gault formula for estimating creatinine clearance. Ann Thorac Surg. 2005;79(6):2024–2031. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2004.12.020. - DOI - PubMed
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical