Closed Mitral Valvotomy Reenvision
- PMID: 36046295
- PMCID: PMC9419540
- DOI: 10.7759/cureus.27401
Closed Mitral Valvotomy Reenvision
Abstract
In developing countries, like the Indian subcontinent, population overload, malnutrition, poor socio-economic status of affected groups, and health care facilities affect the treatment outcome. Nowadays procedures such as percutaneous balloon mitral valvotomy (PBMV) and open heart mitral valve replacement are offered to patients with mitral stenosis. Whenever PBMV is unavailable due to financial constraints and open surgical management cannot be offered due to overburdened healthcare facilities, closed mitral valvotomy (CMV) provides an excellent choice for patients with favorable mitral valve pathology. Many centers do not practice CMV and thus this procedure is dying out. The young generation of surgeons are not been trained in CMV. The purpose of our study is to reenvision CMV and emphasize its vital role in mitral stenosis patient subsets like pregnant women and young adults. We reviewed the literature for various valvotomy techniques done for mitral valve stenosis and restenosis. Immediate and late outcomes were compared between the patients receiving Percutaneous balloon mitral valvotomy and closed mitral valvotomy. The immediate and late-term results are comparable for PBMV and CMV and no statistically significant difference exists. The post-PBMV Mitral valve area (MVA) ranged from 2.1 +/- 0.7 cm^2 to 2.3 +/-0.94 cm^2 and post CMV MVA ranged from 1.3+/-0.3 cm^2 to 2.2+/-0.85 cm^2. Complications developing in both techniques are also nearly similar. Operative mortality in CMV patients ranged from 1% to 4.2%, also observed in PBMV patients in various studies. Mitral Regurgitation occurred in both groups equally and ranged from 0.3% to 14%. Restenosis was observed in both groups in the range of 4% to 5%. High fetal loss of around 20% mortality was witnessed in pregnant mitral stenosis patients undergoing open heart surgery. It's time to re-envision CMV since it is providing substantial outcomes and remitting the need for open-heart surgery at a very low cost in patients with mitral stenosis with a pliable valve.
Keywords: closed mitral valvotomy; mitral stenosis; mitral stenosis in pregnancy; mitral valve surgery; percutaneous balloon mitral valvotomy.
Copyright © 2022, Pathak et al.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
References
-
- Global, regional, and national burden of rheumatic heart disease, 1990-2015. Watkins DA, Johnson CO, Colquhoun SM, et al. N Engl J Med. 2017;377:713–722. - PubMed
-
- Cardiac disease during pregnancy-a free state perspective on maternal and mortality. Schoon MG, Bam RH & Wolmarans L. https://journals.co.za/doi/abs/10.10520/AJA10159657_586 South African Medical Journal. 1997;87:19–22. - PubMed
-
- ACC/AHA 2006 guidelines for the management of patients with valvular heart disease: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on practice guidelines (writing Committee to revise the 1998 guidelines for the management of patients with valvular heart disease) developed in collaboration with the Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists endorsed by the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions and the Society of Thoracic Surgeons. Bonow RO, Carabello BA, Chatterjee K, et al. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006;48:0–148. - PubMed
-
- Guidelines on the management of valvular heart disease: the Task Force on the Management of Valvular Heart Disease of the European Society of Cardiology. Vahanian A, Baumgartner H, Bax J, et al. Eur Heart J. 2007;28:230–268. - PubMed
-
- Closed mitral valvotomy for mitral restenosis: experience in 113 consecutive cases. Suri RK, Pathania R, et al. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1996;112:727–730. - PubMed
Publication types
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources