Outcomes of de novo belatacept-based immunosuppression regimen and avoidance of calcineurin inhibitors in recipients of kidney allografts at higher risk for underutilization
- PMID: 36047901
- DOI: 10.1111/nep.14106
Outcomes of de novo belatacept-based immunosuppression regimen and avoidance of calcineurin inhibitors in recipients of kidney allografts at higher risk for underutilization
Abstract
To describe an experience using a protocol using de novo belatacept (DNB) based maintenance immunosuppression in the setting of lymphocyte depletion. A retrospective, observational study was performed on 37 kidney transplant recipients treated with the DNB protocol, which was defined as belatacept initiated within 7 days after a kidney transplant with steroids and mycophenolate with anti-thymocyte globulin (ATG) induction without concomitant calcineurin inhibitors (CNIs). Patients who received a deceased donor kidney meeting one or more of the following criteria: anticipated cold ischemia time (CIT) greater than 24 h, donation after cardiac death, donor acute kidney injury, and a Kidney Donor Profile Index (KDPI) >85% during the study period were included. Patient survival at 1 year was 97.3% and graft survival was 94.6%. Delayed graft function (DGF) occurred in 40.54% of the patients. Two patients experienced a Banff 1B acute cellular rejection. BK viremia was detected in 32.4% of patients. The mean estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) calculated with the use of modification of diet in renal disease (MDRD) equation at 1 year in the study group was 54.7 ml/min/1.73 m2 . We believe that utilization of the DNB protocol, which allows early CNI avoidance, may decrease organ discard rates.
Keywords: de novo belatacept; immunosuppression; transplantation.
© 2022 Asian Pacific Society of Nephrology.
Comment in
-
Outcomes of de novo belatacept-based immunosuppression regimen and avoidance of calcineurin inhibitors in recipients of kidney allografts at higher risk for underutilization.Nephrology (Carlton). 2022 Dec;27(12):1006-1007. doi: 10.1111/nep.14120. Epub 2022 Oct 17. Nephrology (Carlton). 2022. PMID: 36251149 No abstract available.
References
REFERENCES
-
- Wolfe RA, Ashby VB, Milford EL, et al. Comparison of mortality in all patients on dialysis, patients on dialysis awaiting transplantation, and recipients of a first cadaveric transplant. N Engl J Med. 1999;341(23):1725-1730.
-
- Ortiz F, Aronen P, Koskinen PK, et al. Health-related quality of life after kidney transplantation: who benefits the most? Transpl Int. 2014;27(11):1143-1151.
-
- Hart A, Smith JM, Skeans MA, et al. OPTN/SRTR 2018 Annual Data Report: Kidney. Am J Transplant. 2019;20(suppl 1):20-130.
-
- Massie AB, Leanza J, Fahmy LM, et al. A risk index for living donor kidney transplantation. Am J Transplant. 2016;16(7):2077-84. doi:10.1111/ajt.13709
-
- Gupta A, Francos G, Frank AM, Shah AP. KDPI score is a strong predictor of future graft function: moderate KDPI (35-85) and high KDPI (>85) grafts yield similar graft function and survival. Clin Nephrol. 2016;86(10):175-182.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials
Miscellaneous
