Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2022 Sep 10;400(10355):832-845.
doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(22)01545-8. Epub 2022 Aug 29.

Effect of statin therapy on muscle symptoms: an individual participant data meta-analysis of large-scale, randomised, double-blind trials

Collaborators
Meta-Analysis

Effect of statin therapy on muscle symptoms: an individual participant data meta-analysis of large-scale, randomised, double-blind trials

Cholesterol Treatment Trialists' Collaboration. Lancet. .

Erratum in

  • Department of Error.
    [No authors listed] [No authors listed] Lancet. 2022 Oct 8;400(10359):1194. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(22)01891-8. Lancet. 2022. PMID: 36216002 Free PMC article. No abstract available.

Abstract

Background: Statin therapy is effective for the prevention of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease and is widely prescribed, but there are persisting concerns that statin therapy might frequently cause muscle pain or weakness. We aimed to address these through an individual participant data meta-analysis of all recorded adverse muscle events in large, long-term, randomised, double-blind trials of statin therapy.

Methods: Randomised trials of statin therapy were eligible if they aimed to recruit at least 1000 participants with a scheduled treatment duration of at least 2 years, and involved a double-blind comparison of statin versus placebo or of a more intensive versus a less intensive statin regimen. We analysed individual participant data from 19 double-blind trials of statin versus placebo (n=123 940) and four double-blind trials of a more intensive versus a less intensive statin regimen (n=30 724). Standard inverse-variance-weighted meta-analyses of the effects on muscle outcomes were conducted according to a prespecified protocol.

Findings: Among 19 placebo-controlled trials (mean age 63 years [SD 8], with 34 533 [27·9%] women, 59 610 [48·1%] participants with previous vascular disease, and 22 925 [18·5%] participants with diabetes), during a weighted average median follow-up of 4·3 years, 16 835 (27·1%) allocated statin versus 16 446 (26·6%) allocated placebo reported muscle pain or weakness (rate ratio [RR] 1·03; 95% CI 1·01-1·06). During year 1, statin therapy produced a 7% relative increase in muscle pain or weakness (1·07; 1·04-1·10), corresponding to an absolute excess rate of 11 (6-16) events per 1000 person-years, which indicates that only one in 15 ([1·07-1·00]/1·07) of these muscle-related reports by participants allocated to statin therapy were actually due to the statin. After year 1, there was no significant excess in first reports of muscle pain or weakness (0·99; 0·96-1·02). For all years combined, more intensive statin regimens (ie, 40-80 mg atorvastatin or 20-40 mg rosuvastatin once per day) yielded a higher RR than less intensive or moderate-intensity regimens (1·08 [1·04-1·13] vs 1·03 [1·00-1·05]) compared with placebo, and a small excess was present (1·05 [0·99-1·12]) for more intensive regimens after year 1. There was no clear evidence that the RR differed for different statins, or in different clinical circumstances. Statin therapy yielded a small, clinically insignificant increase in median creatine kinase values of approximately 0·02 times the upper limit of normal.

Interpretation: Statin therapy caused a small excess of mostly mild muscle pain. Most (>90%) of all reports of muscle symptoms by participants allocated statin therapy were not due to the statin. The small risks of muscle symptoms are much lower than the known cardiovascular benefits. There is a need to review the clinical management of muscle symptoms in patients taking a statin.

Funding: British Heart Foundation, Medical Research Council, Australian National Health and Medical Research Council.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declaration of interests JA and DP report receiving a grant to their research institution from Novartis for the ORION 4 trial of inclisiran. AK reports receiving grants for his institution from Abbott, Amgen, and Mylan; consulting fees from AstraZeneca; honoraria from Sanofi and Pfizer; and is a Data Safety Monitoring Board member of the Kowa PROMINENT trial. JS reports receiving grants for his institution from Abbvie, Astra Zeneca, Bayer, Bristol Myers Squibb, Pfizer, and Roche. RC reports a patent for a statin-related myopathy genetic test licensed to University of Oxford from Boston Heart Diagnostics (RC has waived any personal reward). All other authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Effect on muscle adverse events in trials of any statin regimen versus placebo (A) and more versus less intensive statin regimens (B) Bold data are the totals or subtotals. O–E=observed minus expected. Var=variance.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Effect on any muscle pain or weakness, by duration of treatment, in trials of any statin regimen versus placebo Bold data are the totals or subtotals. White squares indicate months, black squares indicate years. The test for heterogeneity in the log rate ratio between the first year and all subsequent years combined: χ2 =12·1, p=0·0005. For each risk period, percentages shown are of those alive and still at risk of a first report of muscle pain or weakness at the start of the risk period. O–E=observed minus expected. Var=variance.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Rate ratio and absolute rate difference for muscle adverse events by duration of treatment, in trials of any statin regimen versus placebo
Figure 4
Figure 4
Effect of less intensive or moderate-intensity statin regimens on any muscle pain or weakness, by participant characteristics Bold indicates the overall summary result. White squares indicate missing data. Tests of heterogeneity (or trend) listed after each prognostic characteristic are of the log rate ratio for each of the subgroups of that characteristic, and are uncorrected for multiple comparisons. GFR=glomerular filtration rate. LDL=low-density lipoprotein. O–E=observed minus expected. Var=variance.

Comment in

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Roth GA, Mensah GA, Johnson CO, et al. Global burden of cardiovascular diseases and risk factors, 1990-2019: update from the GBD 2019 study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2020;76:2982–3021. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Collins R, Reith C, Emberson J, et al. Interpretation of the evidence for the efficacy and safety of statin therapy. Lancet. 2016;388:2532–2561. - PubMed
    1. Cholesterol Treatment Trialists' Collaboration Efficacy and safety of more intensive lowering of LDL cholesterol: a meta-analysis of data from 170,000 participants in 26 randomised trials. Lancet. 2010;376:1670–1681. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Cholesterol Treatment Trialists' Collaboration The effects of lowering LDL cholesterol with statin therapy in people at low risk of vascular disease: meta-analysis of individual data from 27 randomised trials. Lancet. 2012;380:581–590. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Cholesterol Treatment Trialists' Collaboration Efficacy and safety of LDL-lowering therapy among men and women: meta-analysis of individual data from 174,000 participants in 27 randomised trials. Lancet. 2015;385:1397–1405. - PubMed

Publication types

Substances