Utilizing machine learning to predict unplanned cesarean delivery
- PMID: 36049888
- DOI: 10.1002/ijgo.14433
Utilizing machine learning to predict unplanned cesarean delivery
Abstract
Objective: To develop a comprehensive machine learning (ML) model predicting unplanned cesarean delivery (uCD) among singleton pregnancies based on features available at admission to labor.
Methods: A retrospective cohort study from a tertiary medical center. Women with singleton vertex pregnancy of 34 weeks or more admitted for vaginal delivery between March 2011 and May 2019 were included. The cohort was divided into training (80%) and validation (20%) data sets. A separate cohort between June 2019 and April 2021 served as a test data set. Features selection was performed using a Random Forest ML algorithm.
Results: The study population included 73 667 women, of which 4125 (6.33%) underwent uCD. The final model consisted of 13 features, based on prediction importance. The XGBoost model performed best with areas under the curve for the training, validation, and test data sets of 0.874, 0.839, and 0.840, respectively. The model showed a 65% positive predictive value for uCD among women in the 100th centile group, and a 99% or more negative predictive value in the less than 50th centile group. Positive and negative predictive values remained high among subgroups with high pretest probability of uCD.
Conclusion: An ML model for the prediction of uCD provides clinically useful risk stratification that remains accurate across gestational weeks 34-42 and among clinical risk groups. The model may be clinically useful for physicians and women admitted for labor.
Synopsis: A machine learning model predicts unplanned cesarean delivery and can inform women's individualized decision making.
Keywords: artificial intelligence; individualized prediction; model; unplanned cesarean delivery; vaginal delivery.
© 2022 The Authors. International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics.
References
REFERENCES
-
- Rosenbloom JI, Stout MJ, Tuuli MG, et al. New labor management guidelines and changes in cesarean delivery patterns. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2017;217(6):689.e1-689.e8.
-
- Burke N, Burke G, Breathnach F, et al. Prediction of cesarean delivery in the term nulliparous woman: results from the prospective, multicenter genesis study. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2017;216(6):598.e1-598.e11.
-
- Rose A, Raja EA, Bhattacharya S, Black M. Intervention thresholds and cesarean section rates: a time-trends analysis. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2018;97(10):1257-1266.
-
- Levine LD, Downes KL, Parry S, Elovitz MA, Sammel MD, Srinivas SK. A validated calculator to estimate risk of cesarean after an induction of labor with an unfavorable cervix. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2018;218(2):254.e1-254.e7.
-
- Alexander JM, Leveno KJ, Rouse DJ, et al. Comparison of maternal and infant outcomes from primary cesarean delivery during the second compared with first stage of labor. Obstet Gynecol. 2007;109(4):917-921.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous