Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Aug 2;17(1):52.
doi: 10.5334/gh.1137. eCollection 2022.

Cardiovascular Health in India - a Report Card from Three Urban and Rural Surveys of 22,144 Adults

Affiliations

Cardiovascular Health in India - a Report Card from Three Urban and Rural Surveys of 22,144 Adults

Roopa Shivashankar et al. Glob Heart. .

Erratum in

Abstract

Background: Markers of ideal cardiovascular health (CVH) predict cardiovascular events. We estimated the prevalence of ideal CVH markers in two levels of cities and villages in India.

Methods: We did pooled analysis of individual-level data from three cross sectional surveys of adults ≥ 30 years over 2010-14 (CARRS: Centre for cArdiometabolic Risk Reduction in South Asia; UDAY and Solan Surveillance Study) representing metropolitan cities; smaller cities and rural areas in diverse locations of India. We defined ideal CVH using modified American Heart Association recommendations: not smoking, ≥ 5 servings of fruits and vegetables (F&V), high physical activity (PA), body mass index (BMI) <25 Kg/m2, blood pressure (BP) <120/80 mm Hg, fasting plasma glucose (FPG) <100 mg/dl, and total cholesterol (TC) <200 mg/dL. We estimated (1) age-and sex-standardized prevalence of ideal CVH and (2) prevalence of good (≥6 markers), moderate (4-5), and poor CVH (≤3) adjusted for age, sex, education, and stratified by setting and asset tertiles.

Results: Of the total 22,144 participants, the prevalence of ideal CVH markers were: not smoking (76.7% [95% CI 76.1, 77.2]), consumed ≥5 F&V (4.2% [3.9, 4.5]), high PA (67.5% [66.8, 68.2]), optimum BMI (59.6% [58.9, 60.3]), ideal BP (34.5% [33.9, 35.2]), FPG (65.8% [65.1, 66.5]) and TC (65.4% [64.7, 66.1]). The mean number of ideal CVH metrics was 3.7(95% CI: 3.7, 3.8). Adjusted prevalence of good, moderate, and poor CVH, varied across settings: metropolitan (3.9%, 41.0%, and 55.1%), smaller cities (7.8%, 49.2%, and 43%), and rural (10.4%, 60.9%, and 28.7%) and across asset tertiles: Low (11.0%, 55.9%, 33.1%), Middle (6.3%, 52.2%, 41.5%), and High (5.0%, 46.4%, 48.7%), respectively.

Conclusion: Achievement of ideal CVH varied, with higher prevalence in rural and lower asset tertiles. Multi-sectoral and targeted policy and program actions are needed to improve CVH in diverse contexts in India.

Keywords: Cardiovascular health; India; Population Survey; socioeconomic status; urban living.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have no competing interests to declare.

Figures

Flow chart of participant selections from CARRS, UDAY, and SSS.
Figure 1
Flow chart of participant selections from CARRS, UDAY, and SSS. Notes: Abbreviations CARRS- Centre of Cardiometabolic Risk Reduction in South Asia; SSS- Solan Surveillance Study; h/o CVD- history of CVD. * Missing outcome- If data is missing on one or more of tobacco use, diet, physical activity, blood pressure, body mass index, fasting plasma glucose or total cholesterol.
Adjusted prevalence of good, moderate and poor cardiovascular health by socio-demographic factors (N = 22,144).
Figure 2
Adjusted prevalence of good, moderate and poor cardiovascular health by socio-demographic factors (N = 22,144). Notes: The bars show precentages and line represents 95% confidence intervals. * Adjusted for age, sex, education, asset index and place of residence.
Adjusted prevalence of good, moderate and poor cardiovascular health by asset index in Metropolitan cities, smaller cities, and rural areas.
Figure 3
Adjusted prevalence of good, moderate and poor cardiovascular health by asset index in Metropolitan cities, smaller cities, and rural areas. Note: The bars show percentages. *Adjusted for age, sex, and education.

References

    1. Vos T, Lim SS, Abbafati C, et al. Global burden of 369 diseases and injuries in 204 countries and territories, 1990–2019: A systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019. The Lancet. 2020; 396(10258): 1204–22. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30925-9 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Dandona L, Dandona R, Kumar GA, et al. Nations within a nation: variations in epidemiological transition across the states of India, 1990–2016 in the Global Burden of Disease Study. The Lancet. 2017; 390(10111): 2437–60. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)32804-0 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Yusuf S, Hawken S, Ôunpuu S, et al. Effect of potentially modifiable risk factors associated with myocardial infarction in 52 countries (the INTERHEART study): Case-control study. The Lancet. 2004; 364(9438): 937–52. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(04)17018-9 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Lloyd-Jones DM, Hong Y, Labarthe D, et al. Defining and Setting National Goals for Cardiovascular Health Promotion and Disease Reduction. Circulation. 2010; 121(4): 586–613. DOI: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.109.192703 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Wasir JS, Misra A. The Metabolic Syndrome in Asian Indians: Impact of Nutritional and Socio-economic Transition in India. Metab Syndr Relat Disord. 2004; 2(1): 14–23. DOI: 10.1089/met.2004.2.14 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources