Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Aug 10:20:4271-4287.
doi: 10.1016/j.csbj.2022.08.017. eCollection 2022.

Network metrics, structural dynamics and density functional theory calculations identified a novel Ursodeoxycholic Acid derivative against therapeutic target Parkin for Parkinson's disease

Affiliations

Network metrics, structural dynamics and density functional theory calculations identified a novel Ursodeoxycholic Acid derivative against therapeutic target Parkin for Parkinson's disease

Aniket Naha et al. Comput Struct Biotechnol J. .

Abstract

Parkinson's disease (PD) has been designated as one of the priority neurodegenerative disorders worldwide. Although diagnostic biomarkers have been identified, early onset detection and targeted therapy are still limited. An integrated systems and structural biology approach were adopted to identify therapeutic targets for PD. From a set of 49 PD associated genes, a densely connected interactome was constructed. Based on centrality indices, degree of interaction and functional enrichments, LRRK2, PARK2, PARK7, PINK1 and SNCA were identified as the hub-genes. PARK2 (Parkin) was finalized as a potent theranostic candidate marker due to its strong association (score > 0.99) with α-synuclein (SNCA), which directly regulates PD progression. Besides, modeling and validation of Parkin structure, an extensive virtual-screening revealed small (commercially available) inhibitors against Parkin. Molecule-258 (ZINC5022267) was selected as a potent candidate based on pharmacokinetic profiles, Density Functional Theory (DFT) energy calculations (ΔE = 6.93 eV) and high binding affinity (Binding energy = -6.57 ± 0.1 kcal/mol; Inhibition constant = 15.35 µM) against Parkin. Molecular dynamics simulation of protein-inhibitor complexes further strengthened the therapeutic propositions with stable trajectories (low structural fluctuations), hydrogen bonding patterns and interactive energies (>0kJ/mol). Our study encourages experimental validations of the novel drug candidate to prevent the auto-inhibition of Parkin mediated ubiquitination in PD.

Keywords: ADMET, Absorption, Distribution, Metabolism, Excretion, Toxicity; AI, Artificial Intelligence; BBB, Blood Brain Barrier; Biomarker; CS, Confidence Scores; DFT, Density Functional Theory; DL, Deep Learning; Docking; FEA, Functional Enrichment Analysis; GI, Gasto-Intestinal; GIN, Gene Interaction Network; GO, Gene Ontology; HOMO, Highest Occupied Molecular Orbital; IC, Inhibition Constant; LB, Lewy Bodies; LD, Lethal Dose; LUMO, Lowest Unoccupied Molecular Orbital; Ligand optimization; MDS, Molecular Dynamics Simulation; ML, Machine Learning; MMP, Mitochondrial Membrane Potential; Neurodegenerative disorder; PD, Parkinson's Disease; RMSD, Root Means Square Deviation; RMSF, Root Means Square Fluctuation; Rg, Radius of Gyration; SNpc, Substantia Nigra pars compacta; Simulation; Systems biology; TPSA, Total Polar Surface Area; UDCA, Ursodeoxycholic Acid.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Figures

None
Graphical abstract
Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Gene Interaction Network Analysis: (a) MCODE clustering analysis of 49 PD associated genes (b) Hub genes and associated genes involved in apoptosis [GO:0042981; GO:2001233] (c) Hub genes and associated genes involved in oxidative stress [GO:2000377; GO:0006979; GO:0034599] (d) Hub genes and associated genes involved in mitophagy [GO:0010821; GO:1903599; GO:0051881; GO:1903146].
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Structural Analysis of Parkin: (a) Optimized modeled structure (b) Global model quality (c) Local model quality (d) Atomic-level fluctuations (normalized B-factor), solvent accessibility and secondary structural analysis (e) Propensity plot (f) ProTSAV heat-map (g) Extent of disorderness.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Stability Analysis of Parkin: (a) Global folding free energy of thermodynamic and kinetic constraints of Parkin (b) Backbone stability profile of Parkin (c) Residue-level fluctuation profile of Parkin.
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
MDS analysis of unbound Parkin: (a) RMSD curve (b) Residue-level RMSF plot (c) Rg trajectory (d) Minimum distance amongst proximal backbone residues (e) Number of intermolecular (protein-solvent) hydrogen bonds (f) SASA trajectory (g) Potential energy curve (h) Total energy curve.
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
DFT simulations highlighting frontier molecular orbital (HOMO-LUMO) and electron density map of: (a) UDCA (b) Molecule-258 (c) Molecule-297 (d) Molecule-371.
Fig. 6
Fig. 6
Molecular Docking Profiles: (a) 3D conformer of Parkin highlighting its RING domains (b) Binding energies and Inhibition Constants of docked complexes (c) Intermolecular interaction profile of UDCA (d) Intermolecular interaction profile of Molecule-258 (e) Intermolecular interaction profile of Molecule-297 (f) Intermolecular interaction profile of Molecule-371.
Fig. 7
Fig. 7
MDS analysis of Parkin-Inhibitor Complexes: (a) RMSD curve (b) Residue-level RMSF plot (c) Rg trajectory (d) Number of intermolecular (protein-inhibitor) hydrogen bonds (e) SASA trajectory (f) Free energy of solvation (g) Interaction energy profile (h) Total energy curve.

References

    1. Draoui A., El Hiba O., Aimrane A., El Khiat A., Gamrani H. Parkinson’s disease: From bench to bedside. Rev Neurol (Paris) 2020;176:543–559. doi: 10.1016/j.neurol.2019.11.002. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Gilbert R.M., Standaert D.G. Bridging the gaps: More inclusive research needed to fully understand Parkinson’s disease. Mov Disord. 2020;35:231–234. doi: 10.1002/mds.27906. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Simon D.K., Tanner C.M., Brundin P. Parkinson Disease Epidemiology, Pathology, Genetics, and Pathophysiology. Clin Geriatr Med. 2020;36:1–12. doi: 10.1016/j.cger.2019.08.002. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Blauwendraat C., Nalls M.A., Singleton A.B. The genetic architecture of Parkinson’s disease. Lancet Neurol. 2020;19:170–178. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(19)30287-X. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Gandhi S., Wood N.W. Molecular pathogenesis of Parkinson’s disease. Hum Mol Genet. 2005;14:2749–2755. doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddi308. - DOI - PubMed