Atypical presentations of inclusion body myositis: Clinical characteristics and long-term outcomes
- PMID: 36052422
- DOI: 10.1002/mus.27716
Atypical presentations of inclusion body myositis: Clinical characteristics and long-term outcomes
Abstract
Introductions/aims: Inclusion body myositis (IBM) typically presents with progressive weakness preferentially involving finger flexors and quadriceps. Atypical presentations have been less commonly reported. Here, we aim to describe the clinical characteristics and long-term outcomes of IBM patients with atypical presentations.
Methods: We retrospectively searched the Mayo Clinic medical records to identify IBM patients with atypical disease onset, seen between 2015 and 2020.
Results: We identified 357 IBM patients, of whom 50 (14%) had an atypical presentation. Thirty-eight patients were diagnosed with IBM because they fulfilled one of the European Neuromuscular Center diagnostic categories at a later stage, 10 had all IBM histopathological features, and 2 were diagnosed on the basis of clinical and laboratory data. The most common presentation was dysphagia (50%), followed by asymptomatic hyperCKemia (24%; CK, creatine kinase), then foot drop (12%). 6% of patients presented with proximal arm weakness, 4% with axial weakness and 4% with facial diplegia. Median time from symptom onset to diagnosis was 9 y. Median age at diagnosis was 70.5 y. 16% of patients needed a walking aid. When tested, 86.5% of patients had impaired swallowing and 56% had elevated cytosolic nucleotidase-1A antibodies. Only 1/26 patients who received immunotherapy had minimal improvement. Upon follow-up, most patients had generalization of their weakness with a decline in their strength summated score of 0.082/mo.
Discussion: A significant proportion of IBM patients may have an atypical presentation. Recognition of such heterogeneity could improve early diagnosis, prevent unnecessary immunotherapy, and provide insight for future diagnostic criteria development and clinical trials.
Keywords: asymptomatic hyperCKemia; axial myopathy; dysphagia; foot drop; inclusion body myositis.
© 2022 Wiley Periodicals LLC.
References
REFERENCES
-
- Callan A, Capkun G, Vasanthaprasad V, Freitas R, Needham M. A systematic review and meta-analysis of prevalence studies of sporadic inclusion body myositis. J Neuromuscul Dis. 2017;4(2):127-137.
-
- Lotz BP, Engel AG, Nishino H, Stevens JC, Litchy WJ. Inclusion body myositis. Observations in 40 patients. Brain. 1989;112(Pt 3):727-747.
-
- Rose MR, Group EIW. 188th ENMC international workshop: inclusion body myositis, 2-4 December 2011, Naarden. Neuromuscul Disord. 2013;23(12):1044-1055.
-
- Lloyd TE, Mammen AL, Amato AA, Weiss MD, Needham M, Greenberg SA. Evaluation and construction of diagnostic criteria for inclusion body myositis. Neurology. 2014;83(5):426-433.
-
- Sangha G, Yao B, Lunn D, et al. Longitudinal observational study investigating outcome measures for clinical trials in inclusion body myositis. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2021;92:854-862.
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials
