Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2022 Oct;27(10):934-940.
doi: 10.1111/tmi.13815. Epub 2022 Sep 5.

Boosting ethics review capacity in public health emergency situations: Co-creation of a training model for French-speaking research ethics committees

Affiliations
Review

Boosting ethics review capacity in public health emergency situations: Co-creation of a training model for French-speaking research ethics committees

Vivi Maketa et al. Trop Med Int Health. 2022 Oct.

Abstract

Background: Ethics review preparedness is a major foundation for national effective response to public health emergencies, because it promotes pertinent research and enhances the protection of research participants and communities. In low-income countries, it can also promote equitable research partnership. However, most relevant literature is in English and not easily accessible for the members of research ethics committees in French-speaking African countries.

Methods: A training module in French, addressing the issue of research ethics review during outbreaks and other public health emergencies, was designed based on a non-systematic literature review, and in order to be complementary to the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) national guidelines for ethics review. The module was administered to 42 members of the five ethics committees in DRC that expressed their interest for the training.

Result: This training, co-designed with local stakeholders, in the local working language and taking into account local circumstances and regulation, provided participants with up-to-date insights of research ethics (and research ethics preparedness) in public health emergencies. It resulted in rich reflection and knowledge-sharing on good practices across the ethics committees.

Conclusion: As most participating ethics committees do not have yet explicit standard operating procedures for expedited review of protocols submitted in emergency situations, this would be a next important step to facilitate emergency reviews in the most efficient way.

Keywords: Democratic Republic of Congo; Sub-Saharan Africa; co-creation; developing countries; ethics; research; training.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Saxena A, Horby P, Amuasi J, Aagaard N, Köhler J, Gooshk ES, et al. Ethics preparedness: facilitating ethics review during outbreaks ‐ recommendations from an expert panel. BMC Med Ethics. 2019;20:29. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Schopper D, Ravinetto R, Schwartz L, Kamaara E, Sheel S, Segelid MJ, et al. Research ethics governance in times of Ebola. Public Health Ethics. 2016;10:phw039–61. 10.1093/phe/phw039 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Alirol E, Kuesel AC, Guraiib MM, de la Fuente‐Núñez V, Saxena A, Gomes MF. Ethics review of studies during public health emergencies‐the experience of the WHO ethics review committee during the Ebola virus disease epidemic. BMC Med Ethics. 2017;18(1):1–11. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Déclaration d'Helsinki de l'AMM – Principes éthiques applicables à la recherche médicale impliquant des êtres humains. 2014.
    1. International ethical guidelines for health‐related research involving humans. Fourth ed. Geneva: Council for International Organizations of Medical Sciences (CIOMS); 2016.

Publication types