Sex differences in sleep quality and psychological distress: Insights from a middle-aged twin sample from Spain
- PMID: 36054078
- DOI: 10.1111/jsr.13714
Sex differences in sleep quality and psychological distress: Insights from a middle-aged twin sample from Spain
Abstract
There is a moderate association between poor sleep and psychological distress. There are marked sex differences in the prevalence of both variables, with females outnumbering males. However, the origin of these sex differences remains unclear. The objectives of this study were to: (1) study genetic and environmental influences on the relationship between poor sleep quality and psychological distress; and (2) test possible sex differences in this relationship. The sample comprised 3544 participants from the Murcia Twin Registry. Univariate and multivariate twin models were fitted to estimate the magnitude of genetic and environmental influences on both individual variance and covariance between poor sleep quality and psychological distress. Sleep quality and psychological distress were measured using the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index and the EuroQol five-dimensions questionnaire, respectively. The results reveal a strong genetic association between poor sleep quality and psychological distress, which accounts for 44% (95%CI: 27%-61%) of the association between these two variables. Substantial genetic (rA = 0.50; 95%CI: 0.32, 0.67) and non-shared environmental (rE = 0.41; 95%CI: 0.30, 0.52) correlations were also found, indicating a moderate overlap between genetic (and non-shared environmental) factors influencing both phenotypes. Equating sexes in sex-limitation models did not result in significant decreases in model fit. Despite the remarkable sex differences in the prevalence of both poor sleep quality and psychological distress, there were no sex differences in the genetic and environmental influences on these variables. This suggests that genetic factors play a similar role for men and women in explaining individual differences in both phenotypes and their relationship.
Keywords: psychological distress; sleep quality; twins.
© 2022 The Authors. Journal of Sleep Research published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of European Sleep Research Society.
References
REFERENCES
-
- Albert, P. R. (2015). Why is depression more prevalent in women? Journal of Psychiatry & Neuroscience, 40(4), 219-221.
-
- American Psychiatric Association (Ed.). (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed.). American Psychiatric Association.
-
- Aragam, N., Wang, K. S., & Pan, Y. (2011). Genome-wide association analysis of gender differences in major depressive disorder in The Netherlands NESDA and NTR population-based samples. Journal of Affective Disorders, 133(3), 516-521. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2011.04.054
-
- Arnau-Soler, A., Adams, M. J., Clarke, T. K., DJ, M. I., Milburn, K., Navrady, L., Generation Scotland, Major Depressive Disorder Working Group of the Psychiatric Genomics Consortium, Hayward, C., McIntosh, A., & Thomson, P. A. (2019). A validation of the diathesis-stress model for depression in generation Scotland. Translational Psychiatry, 9(1), 25. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41398-018-0356-7
-
- Buysse, D. J., Reynolds, C. F., Monk, T. H., Berman, S. R., & Kupfer, D. J. (1989). The Pittsburgh sleep quality index: A new instrument for psychiatric practice and research. Psychiatry Research, 28(2), 193-213.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources