Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2023 Feb;98(1):1-18.
doi: 10.1111/brv.12892. Epub 2022 Aug 25.

Can metabolic traits explain animal community assembly and functioning?

Affiliations
Review

Can metabolic traits explain animal community assembly and functioning?

Simon J Brandl et al. Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2023 Feb.

Abstract

All animals on Earth compete for free energy, which is acquired, assimilated, and ultimately allocated to growth and reproduction. Competition is strongest within communities of sympatric, ecologically similar animals of roughly equal size (i.e. horizontal communities), which are often the focus of traditional community ecology. The replacement of taxonomic identities with functional traits has improved our ability to decipher the ecological dynamics that govern the assembly and functioning of animal communities. Yet, the use of low-resolution and taxonomically idiosyncratic traits in animals may have hampered progress to date. An animal's metabolic rate (MR) determines the costs of basic organismal processes and activities, thus linking major aspects of the multifaceted constructs of ecological niches (where, when, and how energy is obtained) and ecological fitness (how much energy is accumulated and passed on to future generations). We review evidence from organismal physiology to large-scale analyses across the tree of life to propose that MR gives rise to a group of meaningful functional traits - resting metabolic rate (RMR), maximum metabolic rate (MMR), and aerobic scope (AS) - that may permit an improved quantification of the energetic basis of species coexistence and, ultimately, the assembly and functioning of animal communities. Specifically, metabolic traits integrate across a variety of typical trait proxies for energy acquisition and allocation in animals (e.g. body size, diet, mobility, life history, habitat use), to yield a smaller suite of continuous quantities that: (1) can be precisely measured for individuals in a standardized fashion; and (2) apply to all animals regardless of their body plan, habitat, or taxonomic affiliation. While integrating metabolic traits into animal community ecology is neither a panacea to disentangling the nuanced effects of biological differences on animal community structure and functioning, nor without challenges, a small number of studies across different taxa suggest that MR may serve as a useful proxy for the energetic basis of competition in animals. Thus, the application of MR traits for animal communities can lead to a more general understanding of community assembly and functioning, enhance our ability to trace eco-evolutionary dynamics from genotypes to phenotypes (and vice versa), and help predict the responses of animal communities to environmental change. While trait-based ecology has improved our knowledge of animal communities to date, a more explicit energetic lens via the integration of metabolic traits may further strengthen the existing framework.

Keywords: biodiversity; functional diversity; limiting similarity; metabolic theory of ecology; niche theory; traits.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

REFERENCES

    1. †Adams, S. M., McLean, R. & Parrotta, J. (1982). Energy partitioning in largemouth bass under conditions of seasonally fluctuating prey availability. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 111, 549-558.
    1. Anderson, K. J. & Jetz, W. (2005). The broad-scale ecology of energy expenditure of endotherms. Ecology Letters 8, 310-318.
    1. *Andriuzzi, W. S., Schmidt, O., Brussaard, L., Faber, J. H. & Bolger, T. (2016). Earthworm functional traits and interspecific interactions affect plant nitrogen acquisition and primary production. Applied Soil Ecology 104, 148-156.
    1. *Angelini, C. & Silliman, B. R. (2014). Secondary foundation species as drivers of trophic and functional diversity: evidence from a tree-epiphyte system. Ecology 95, 185-196.
    1. *Arnan, X., Cerdá, X., Rodrigo, A. & Retana, J. (2013). Response of ant functional composition to fire. Ecography 36, 1182-1192.

LinkOut - more resources